Lord Bracknell
On fire
... and some of them will be sharing the post-match drinking opportunities with us in the North Stand concourse.The vast majority of whom are fine.
... and some of them will be sharing the post-match drinking opportunities with us in the North Stand concourse.The vast majority of whom are fine.
Sticking a pound on the price of a ticket to cover the clubs transport cost and enable "free" travel upon showing a smartcard is a 3% increase. Even if a ticket holder does not use public transport will they begrudge the club a £1 to have a slick transport/ticketing system which is used by the vast majority of supporters? At the end of the day as a tax payer we all have to subsidise rail fairs one way or another regardless of whether we use rail. Why not include our fellow Albion fans?
I've had a conversation with a senior Green councillor who did offer the opinion that the Club weren't doing enough to discourage car use.
Ouch! Perhaps anyone living in the City should be banned from using the car parks or park and ride and leave those facilties to the out of towners! Seriously with all the special bus and coaches , and I think I read 4000 using the train and 4000 using P & R not sure what else you can do.
Not very fair on the people who walk or cycle though. The Withdean situation was different as it was one of the conditions for using the stadium. There's no such requirement at Amex.
The club should be encouraging people to walk or cycle to the ground. Adopting measures that seek to discourage walking and cycling is scarcely going to help us get planning permission for an increased capacity from a Green-led council.
Because some time in the next year or so we will need to get planning permission from the council to get more seats. One question that is bound to come up is transport policy and the question will be asked "What are you doing about sustainable transport?" I reckon that telling a Green-led council that we're asking pedestrians and cyclists to subsidise car drivers would be a sure-fire way to ensure that our request for more seats will be turned down.
EDIT: In fact, I think it should be that the club should be looking to increase cycle parking at the club. Someone on here the other day suggested that cyclists should be given a money on their smartcard or additional loyalty points. I'm not sure that that's feasible but I certainly think that if we do want to put 8000 more seats in, we should be looking at ways to get more people walking or cycling not fewer.
I've had a conversation with a senior Green councillor who did offer the opinion that the Club weren't doing enough to discourage car use.
It wasn't a conversation that was about the club, just a throwaway line that he dropped into a more general conversation about Green transport policy in Brighton and Hove. In fact, I don't think he even knew that I was an Albion supporter. His main point was that there were too many car parks in the City and the football club were adding to them.It'd be interesting to know what percentage of supporters travel to the Amex by public transport. Personally I'd be surprised if there is any club in the country that achieves as high a proportion as us, outside of London.
Did they go into details about what else the club could be doing?
The biggest single "pro-car" piece of marketing that the Club have done is to promote sales of 1901 Club seats by chucking in priority access to car parking spaces. It might have been an effective way of selling more 1901 Club seats than anyone thought possible, and I'm not knocking people for taking up the offer - but it certainly contributed nothing to the Club's image as an advocate of sustainable travel.
Because some time in the next year or so we will need to get planning permission from the council to get more seats. One question that is bound to come up is transport policy and the question will be asked "What are you doing about sustainable transport?" I reckon that telling a Green-led council that we're asking pedestrians and cyclists to subsidise car drivers would be a sure-fire way to ensure that our request for more seats will be turned down.
EDIT: In fact, I think it should be that the club should be looking to increase cycle parking at the club. Someone on here the other day suggested that cyclists should be given a money on their smartcard or additional loyalty points. I'm not sure that that's feasible but I certainly think that if we do want to put 8000 more seats in, we should be looking at ways to get more people walking or cycling not fewer.
How is a compulsory travel voucher 'subsidising car use'?
It wasn't a conversation that was about the club, just a throwaway line that he dropped into a more general conversation about Green transport policy in Brighton and Hove. In fact, I don't think he even knew that I was an Albion supporter. His main point was that there were too many car parks in the City and the football club were adding to them.
To be fair to him ... he recognises that it's not easy to achieve his party's objectives. But he also thinks a Green council has an obligation to try to make a difference.If you get the opportunity, Your Lordship, could you ask him what he thinks we should do? Perhaps he'll organise some training sessions so we can weave our own coracles out of ethically sourced tofu? Or maybe we can offset our carbon footprint on matchdays by having a massed juggle on the beach of an evening??
"Not unreasonable", but, if you want to cover the infrastructure costs of delivering, say, six eight-carriage trains an hour between Brighton and Falmer, it will be considerably more expensive than the stadium.The most appropriate solution to accommodating an extra 8000 spectators is a major upgrading of the train service- probably need a 12 car train every 5/10 minutes.
The club should in all honesty contribute to the infrastructure costs in conjunction with Southern rail, which given the massive cost of the stadium is not unreasonable.
Anything else is just tinkering at the margins.
I've had a conversation with a senior Green councillor who did offer the opinion that the Club weren't doing enough to discourage car use.