The Large One
Who's Next?
You know nothing!
... said the poster who claims he pays Road Tax.
You know nothing!
... said the poster who claims he pays Road Tax.
My car wouldn't be road worthy without it
You pay a tax that doesn't exist?
What a mug.
What the fudge is a tax disc then!?
You've already had this explained to you.
It's an annual tax you pay on your vehicle, the amount of which is determined by the emissions produced. The money goes into the Exchequer's general fund, and is not ring-fenced for transport nor road expenditure.
In short, everyone's taxes - drivers and non-drivers - pay for the roads.
Cyclists should still pay more for the simple fact of being in the way.
Cyclists should still pay more for the simple fact of being in the way.
Cyclists should still pay more for the simple fact of being in the way.
Cyclists should still pay more for the simple fact of being in the way.
there is a worthing bylaw where you can push people off their cycles if they are riding on the pavement........works wonders.....google it
more people should be informed and use it.
power to the pedestrians!
I think you'll find it's cars that are in the way. More bikes would mean less traffic jams and journey times would shorten.
In a dream world,what about those stuck out in the villages that have to travel 30 miles or more each way plus to work every day?
I'd like to know why cyclists feel the need to get in the way of cars on the road when they have a dedicated cycle path 20 meters away. Selfish wankers I say.
As I said, more bikes = less traffic. I did not say NO traffic. I am obviously aware that many journeys need to be done by car, and like most cyclists I am also a car driver.
I'd like to know why cyclists feel the need to get in the way of cars on the road when they have a dedicated cycle path 20 meters away. Selfish wankers I say.
I'd like to know why cyclists feel the need to get in the way of cars on the road when they have a dedicated cycle path 20 meters away. Selfish wankers I say.