dingodan
New member
- Feb 16, 2011
- 10,080
Maybe I should have been more explicit when talking about the 'gentlemen' but yes, I was talking about the ones that over stepped the mark, I was using the inverted commas to make that distinction.
I think that comparing unwanted sexual attention while working at a charity function to hen nights and even the naked butler thing (if that is what it was) is comparing apples and oranges. The huge distinction in both cases is consent.
The huge similarity in both cases is a night with p*ssed up members of (exclusively) the opposite sex, who you have been hired to entertain for one reason and one reason only, because you are sexy.
& How do you know what someone working a hen night has consented to?
I posted an interview given by a women who has worked the President's Club and similar events, she said that men's behavior is generally pretty good and the women who are working are well protected, when people cross the line other people step in, and people who do cross the line get thrown out. She also said that women on women's only nights (which includes charity events by the way) behave far worse and she works with a male who has been sexually assaulted on almost every occasion they have worked together, and people laugh when it happens.
I'm consistent, I think that is sh*tty behavior on the part of those women, and at the same time the person involved can probably decide how to handle it himself, and decide for himself if he wants to continue working nights like that.
Now you be consistent and call for an end to hen nights, and condemn them all as disgusting and the women who attend them as grubby pervs.