Doesn't matter with a goal, if the last part of the body that touched the ball before it went in is the arm, it is disallowed, natural position or notThey don’t know the rules. His arms were in a natural position and into his body.
Ah, I stand corrected.He was the last Brighton player it touched before going in, making him the goalscorer, and in that instance it doesn't matter where his arm is. If it touches the arm at all the goal doesn't stand.
Ummm we mustn’t talk about the officials it’s naughtyAnother goal disallowed. When will you acknowledge the Prem officials are corrupt?
Indeed it is.This is certainly a tasty game
Yeh, I think they got this one right. It’s like the goal Liverpool had ruled out against us last season that would’ve made it 3-0 after 25 mins, but where we drew 2-2.He was the last Brighton player it touched before going in, making him the goalscorer, and in that instance it doesn't matter where his arm is. If it touches the arm at all the goal doesn't stand.
They zoom in on every individual pixel trying to find a reason why to disallow a goal.He was the last Brighton player it touched before going in, making him the goalscorer, and in that instance it doesn't matter where his arm is. If it touches the arm at all the goal doesn't stand.