Lyndhurst 14
Well-known member
- Jan 16, 2008
- 5,242
Sunak says he acted decisively so people could move on. Isn't that just Tory speak for sweep it under the carpet
Nasty little fucker, that one.Looks like Mad Nads has broken the ministerial code in taking up her new Murdoch puppet role at Talk TV
Nadine Dorries broke rules with talk show role - watchdog
The MP should have consulted Parliament's anti-corruption body before taking the job, a watchdog says.www.bbc.co.uk
Imagine being bollocked by Eric Pickles. How bad must you have been?Looks like Mad Nads has broken the ministerial code in taking up her new Murdoch puppet role at Talk TV
Nadine Dorries broke rules with talk show role - watchdog
The MP should have consulted Parliament's anti-corruption body before taking the job, a watchdog says.www.bbc.co.uk
I see Mogg has got a job at Geebies too. These "partisan" news channels are the new medium for the Tories as the Russian money dries up.Nasty little fucker, that one.
Samuel Johnson could not have put it more succinctly when he said "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"Love the queen and country but not enough to pay your fair share of taxes.
Indeed.I see Mogg has got a job at Geebies too. These "partisan" news channels are the new medium for the Tories as the Russian money dries up.
Yeah but why? Its pretty simple stuff, is she missing the limelight?Carol Vorderman is on the case. She has been brilliant for the past week or so.
Because she cares? Who wouldn't care about exposing outright corruption?Yeah but why? Its pretty simple stuff, is she missing the limelight?
Can’t be repeated enough, in my opinion. If she reaches someone who wouldn’t normally engage with political news and makes them aware of wrong doings and corruption, all the better.Yeah but why? Its pretty simple stuff, is she missing the limelight?
I know but was she this noisy when Johnson was hanging on to power?Because she cares? Who wouldn't care about exposing outright corruption?
I agree but why pick on Ritchie when she could have gone for Johnson and Trussterfuck?Can’t be repeated enough, in my opinion. If she reaches someone who wouldn’t normally engage with political news and makes them aware of wrong doings and corruption, all the better.
I think she has always tweeted about the Tory’s. I don’t have Twitter though so I’m notI know but was she this noisy when Johnson was hanging on to power?
I agree but why pick on Ritchie when she could have gone for Johnson and Trussterfuck?
It was Zahawi.I know but was she this noisy when Johnson was hanging on to power?
I agree but why pick on Ritchie when she could have gone for Johnson and Trussterfuck?
It was Zahawi.
This is another of hers. Don't forget, the facts have to be fairly watertight or else she's get sued, like they tried to do to Carole Cadwaller.
I feel like he'd take "Long Boris" and spin it to sound positive.Heard someone say the other day the UK is suffering from "Long Boris". He may be gone but the slime is here to stay in the Tories and they keep constantly slipping over on it
To be fair, the current mob hardly need any of Boris’ sleaze. They come with plenty of their own. They were all part of Boris’ government.Heard someone say the other day the UK is suffering from "Long Boris". He may be gone but the slime is here to stay in the Tories and they keep constantly slipping over on it