Blimey! She is thick enough to be the next Tory PM.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...
- Thread starter TomandJerry
- Start date
Blimey! She is thick enough to be the next Tory PM.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,945
GB News is now planting it's own stooges in it's audiences ? It makes Boris and Nige's Vote Leave campaign look honest
Last edited:
Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,824
Well this is interesting.
I can imagine that Tory HQ are absolutely delighted with geebeebies.
ClemFandango
Active member
- Oct 2, 2023
- 165
This is the main headline on The Guardian website right now:
Labour handling of Azhar Ali ‘shambolic’, says antisemitism report author
Anyone got any opinions on this?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
If they think that Sunak is a liability and want a leadership challenge before the election?GB News is now planting it's own stooges in it's audiences ? It makes the Boris and Nige's Vote Leave campaign look honest
- Oct 12, 2022
- 2,784
Yup, but you’re on the wrong thread.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,945
My opinion is that your posts are getting more desperate by the day. It's really rather amusing, as I said a few pages back
This thread is such a depressing list of what a corrupt cabal in complete breakdown keep doing whilst the fabric of the UK implodes around them.
The only highspots are the occasional forays into whataboutism by the last desperate dregs of the cabal's support. Betting odds, misogyny, but, but, but what about Starmer, wokeism etc etc ............... very brief comical interludes amongst the death throes. If only someone had warned about what would happen ..... oh
Last edited:
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Do you have an opinion? Labour is following electoral law, unlike Rishi Sunak broadcasting during a week when there are two by-elections. Purdah? What Purdah?What else can they do?
Labour withdraws support for Rochdale candidate after Israel-Gaza remarks
Party no longer campaigning for Azhar Ali, who suggested Israel had allowed 7 October attack to happenAletha Adu, Rajeev Syal and Eleni Courea
Mon 12 Feb 2024 23.23 GMT
Labour has withdrawn its support for Azhar Ali, its candidate for this month’s Rochdale byelection, in the wake of controversial comments he made about the 7 October attacks on Israel.
In line with electoral law, Labour cannot replace Ali with another candidate because the deadline passed on 2 February. He will stand as a Labour candidate on the ballot paper, but if elected he will not hold the party whip and will sit as an independent MP.
What else could they do?
Not support him for 24 hours and drop support for him as soon as his garbage came to light.
The Clamp
Well-known member
Nope. You?
Randy McNob
> > > > > > Cardiff > > > > >
- Jun 13, 2020
- 4,732
More interesting than the Prime Minister appearing on a right wing propaganda channel while sending out a minister to say the BBC is bias?
How is anti semitism amusing?It's really rather amusing, as I said a few pages back
Not Starmer's fault and he has done everything right, but disturbing to see racism anywhere in politics surely?
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,945
Machiavelli
Well-known member
My opinion (and this is the wrong thread for it) is that people should be given the benefit of the doubt in the event of single missteps but if further evidence of a pattern of behaviour emerges then that’s a different story. That appears to be what happened in this scenario and the party acted accordingly. It begs questions of the local party who chose him as a candidate, but the idea it reflects on the wider party or Starmer is ludicrous IMHO.
Should someone be barred from office if they were found to chant “Go get your father’s gun and shoot the Palace scum” in the North stand? I don’t think so. Actually taking a gun to Croydon and waving it about, however…
Last edited:
My apologies if I misread your postWe can all edit people's posts to change the meaning before quoting them, but don't expect to be taken seriously
The Clamp
Well-known member
More corruption. Oozing out of every pore.
www.theguardian.com
Tory MP failed to declare wife’s BP shares during oil and gas debates, standards commissioner finds
Watchdog finds three debates in which £50,000 shares ‘might reasonably’ have been thought to influence David Duguid’s actions
www.theguardian.com
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,312
I wouldn't describe this as corruption, more complacency and lack of professionalism. These people should be proud to serve the public, they really should be policing themselves. I am all in favour of having politicians in places where they have industry expertise, and if they DO have industry expertise there there's a good chance they'll have either an equity stake OR close connections with firms that will be affected.More corruption. Oozing out of every pore.
Tory MP failed to declare wife’s BP shares during oil and gas debates, standards commissioner finds
Watchdog finds three debates in which £50,000 shares ‘might reasonably’ have been thought to influence David Duguid’s actions