My goodness!
Finding all those posts must have taken some effort.
Somehow, actually, I doubt it
I think vaggy's entitled to be a bore about Potter while others be bores against Potter (sorry, I mean offer relentless but constructive critical analysis of how Potter should have done things differently and consequently obtained the top ten finish he was jolly well employed to deliver, and should therefore be criticised, albeit I never said he should be sacked - you can infer that if you wish but you'd be putting words into my mouth. But the results speak for themselves, and to consider Potter as an upgrade on CH is naive, that's all I'm saying).