and without the fans he would not have had a club to save
Yep. Spot on! Hopefully that should stop the cat fight on here!
and without the fans he would not have had a club to save
Your point is that football clubs wouldn't exist without fans. Neither would Sainsburys '. The difference is that Sainsbury didn't subsidise my grocery shopping by more than a pound per pound last year.
Now you are arguing for the sake of it. You cannot compare BHAFC with Sainsburys.
and without the fans he would not have had a club to save
TB is not beyond criticism but he is OK in my book
and without the fans he would not have had a club to save
I think you will find I just have...and said they are not alike.
I hate the argument that because bloom has invested heavily, he should be backed.
It's an investment as people have said. He will more than likely get that money back.
And let's not forget, we're the ones spending out of our pockets. If we don't like the product we're receiving, then we have a right to complain about whatever we like.
It's not like the stadium is a gift, his done it to make f**king money, his a businessman.
If this were any other type of business, where we were being failed, no one would have a problem with slating the chairman.
So to summarise, his a businessman, trying to make money with something he enjoys. And could quite possibly be f**king it up because he doesn't know how to run a football club!
Good post - just a couple of caveats.
1). Why wouldn't Adkins have got us to the Premier League? - he succeeded with Southampton (and he didn't throw his toys out of the pram or bugger off).
2). This -
Wasn't working under the continental system pretty much what DID p1ss off Poyet and OG?
Yep, could be we're subsidising TB's hobby by minimising (or at least reducing) his losses!I don't know what you are saying tbf, you tend to beat around the bush using daft analogies.
I made my point clear that fans have poured tens of millions into the club and this shouldn't be taken for granted. There is no argument.
I hate the argument that because bloom has invested heavily, he should be backed.
It's an investment as people have said. He will more than likely get that money back.
And let's not forget, we're the ones spending out of our pockets. If we don't like the product we're receiving, then we have a right to complain about whatever we like.
It's not like the stadium is a gift, his done it to make f**king money, his a businessman.
If this were any other type of business, where we were being failed, no one would have a problem with slating the chairman.
So to summarise, his a businessman, trying to make money with something he enjoys. And could quite possibly be f**king it up because he doesn't know how to run a football club!
Yep, could be we're subsidising TB's hobby by minimising (or at least reducing) his losses!
I totally agree, El Pres is going to wet the bed after seeing this though. Get ready for 10 pages of facts and figures............
Yikes, fancy having a debate and using facts. No way you'd do that.
I hate the argument that because bloom has invested heavily, he should be backed.
It's an investment as people have said. He will more than likely get that money back.
And let's not forget, we're the ones spending out of our pockets. If we don't like the product we're receiving, then we have a right to complain about whatever we like.
It's not like the stadium is a gift, his done it to make f**king money, his a businessman.
If this were any other type of business, where we were being failed, no one would have a problem with slating the chairman.
So to summarise, his a businessman, trying to make money with something he enjoys. And could quite possibly be f**king it up because he doesn't know how to run a football club!
I hate the argument that because bloom has invested heavily, he should be backed.
It's an investment as people have said. He will more than likely get that money back.
And let's not forget, we're the ones spending out of our pockets. If we don't like the product we're receiving, then we have a right to complain about whatever we like.
It's not like the stadium is a gift, his done it to make f**king money, his a businessman.
If this were any other type of business, where we were being failed, no one would have a problem with slating the chairman.
So to summarise, his a businessman, trying to make money with something he enjoys. And could quite possibly be f**king it up because he doesn't know how to run a football club!