If the Outers win,I think it will be in spite of Nodding Nigel, not because of him
Just hope the money you spend wasn't earned in the U.K. We need as many people as possible who work here to spend their untaxed money here - not spend/send it abroad - otherwise it's a drain on our economy.
I just think the calibre of politician fronting both campaigns is horrendous and leaves the country, whatever the result, with not a whole lot to look forward to.
Two individuals who have proved themselves incapable of putting any sort of coherent case for the side of the argument that they have chosen to support.
its a real shame people are putting too much emphasis on the characters of the people on both sides of the debate.
we need to get away from thinking its some sort personal election for them or a career move and concentrate solely on the issues
If we dont we have nothing more than an x factor competition
I'm voting leave and thought Cameron won by a street. Farage, as predicted, switched into ranting mode. I see UKIP's sole MP has distanced himself from Farage's remarks - if your own party isn't supporting you, then you really are in trouble.
Cameron may have given a more polished performance but I'm still voting leave - much as it grieves me to be on the same side as a buffoon like Farage
I knew there would be one or two! Perception is an interesting thing - one man's "ranting" is another man's "passionate", one man's "polished" is another man's "autopilot".
I thought Farage's performance was the more interesting to watch because the result of the next 15 days will define his political career. Last night with Farage there was a sense of man fighting for his life, whereas for CMD it almost felt like another day at the office.
I've been an outer for about 40 years but the one thing that worries me about voting No is that it's seen as a tacit endorsement for Johnson as PM (an Out vote will certainly see CMD leaving and Boris odds-on to take his place), that's a prospect that's really scary.
I'm pissed off that something that should be a debate about the future direction of this country has been turned into a contest for the Tory leadership: something's gone really wrong somewhere
Yes, there was a sense that Cameron was reading from a script but he rarely looked flustered.
Farage, on the other hand, looked wildly out of his depth when the pharmaceutical bloke started pressing him and it was clear that he didn't have a clue about the repercussions for big pharma. I just couldn't imagine Cameron being in that situation. I also think that telling a member of the audience to "calm down" was the sign of someone losing control, accomplished politicians don't do that - especially as the audience member had asked her question perfectly calmly, something the moderator quickly pointed out
its a real shame people are putting too much emphasis on the characters of the people on both sides of the debate.
we need to get away from thinking its some sort personal election for them or a career move and concentrate solely on the issues
If we dont we have nothing more than an x factor competition
Why waste a genuine principle of thinking we should leave on transient politicians, they will soon be gone, anyway rather our own elected politicians than those within the EU shirley .......
Without reading 18 pages........ I would ask :
Why was Cameron given an easier ride? Certain members of the selected audience were just out to target Farage, no matter what he said..
The moderator was a waste of space. Had no control of the audience at all .
They listened with respect to D C , not the "Vote Leave"" arguments.
It was not the promised debate , I think in America they call it a Town Hall Meeting.
Biased, I say!
It's already come out that the black woman that wouldn't let Farage speak is a Huffington Post blogger and 'blacktivist' that was 'hand-picked' to be a member of the audience by ITV.
Without reading 18 pages........ I would ask :
Why was Cameron given an easier ride? Certain members of the selected audience were just out to target Farage, no matter what he said..
The moderator was a waste of space. Had no control of the audience at all .
They listened with respect to D C , not the "Vote Leave"" arguments.
It was not the promised debate , I think in America they call it a Town Hall Meeting.
Biased, I say!
I knew there would be one or two! Perception is an interesting thing - one man's "ranting" is another man's "passionate", one man's "polished" is another man's "autopilot".
I thought Farage's performance was the more interesting to watch because the result of the next 15 days will define his political career. Last night with Farage there was a sense of man fighting for his life, whereas for CMD it almost felt like another day at the office.
Rightly biased I would say. Who is Nigel Farage to share a platform with our elected Prime Minister? That audience democratically elected David Cameron to lead this country. There is no mandate for a constituency MEP to be sharing a debate of this magnitude with our Prime Minister. Why wasn't Gove or Johnson up there? At least they were elected to represent us. Farage is supposedly representing that the EU is not democratic enough - an irony if there ever was one.