alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
No, as that is flawed analysis, as all you are quoting is the known suspects.
That doesn’t make your argument a fact.
How about bollox.
No, as that is flawed analysis, as all you are quoting is the known suspects.
That doesn’t make your argument a fact.
How about bollox.
BBC2 Newnight featuring this tonight.
A brave victim from Rotherham has said Yaxley-Lennon did not expose the grooming scandals.
Yaxley-Lennon is his name. How is he exposing muslim grooming gangs? He isn't arresting them or even investigating them.
He just turns up at courts trying to make scene, which actually endangers the judicial processes.
It is literally pointless arguing with these people. They can not, and probably more likely will not accept the simple fact that their glorious leader broke the law. Then broke it again after being specifically warned NOT to. If he goes back inside, they'll probably cause trouble in London again and the British public will get another bill. Free speech my arse.
It's beneath contempt the way he uses child abuse to push his agenda/celebrity cult.
No he didn't.Its pointless arguing with pillocks like you who try and deflect from the issue at hand , which is whether he exposed or was one of a few who brought grooming gangs to public attention, which he did .
No he didn't.
It was all over the news way before he got involved.
I'd heard of him because of his EDL stuff and his attempts to reinvent himself.
I'd heard about these grooming gangs because of the people who actually exposed them. The social workers who were ignored and the other people on the coal face of the situation.
They brought to public attention the inadequacies of the police and the whole system.
He jumped on the bandwagon as he always does. He's brought nothing to the cause whatsoever but bigotry and ham fisted attempts to look like a hero, while actually damaging the chances of these scumbags being convicted.
You've swallowed it hook line and sinker. Fair enough, but stop telling people that they don't understand "the issue at hand" when they do.
Exactly this
I don’t see many Catholic Church officials being investigated. When’s he moving on to them?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/spurious
Secondly why do posters persist in calling TR S. L-Y? Yes he is using a synonmy, yes everyone knows it now and no it wont change anything. After all every poster in this thread is doing the same, its quite normal in this age of internet.
Pretty sure if you or I were arrested and it was reported in the press they would use our actual names rather than our made up ones.
Its pointless arguing with pillocks like you who try and deflect from the issue at hand , which is whether he exposed or was one of a few who brought grooming gangs to public attention, which he did .
But that doesn't answer my question why some are persisting with it on here. Yes TR is a bit Fake, so is Trump but their issues are not. Maybe some are so used to playing the player than the ball they no longer have any kind of reasoned focus?
No he didn't.
It was all over the news way before he got involved.
I'd heard of him because of his EDL stuff and his attempts to reinvent himself.
I'd heard about these grooming gangs because of the people who actually exposed them. The social workers who were ignored and the other people on the coal face of the situation.
They brought to public attention the inadequacies of the police and the whole system.
He jumped on the bandwagon as he always does. He's brought nothing to the cause whatsoever but bigotry and ham fisted attempts to look like a hero, while actually damaging the chances of these scumbags being convicted.
You've swallowed it hook line and sinker. Fair enough, but stop telling people that they don't understand "the issue at hand" when they do.
he's wrapped up in cotton wool it doesn't affect himYes he did , i havent swallowed anything hook line and sinker , the only people who have is people like you and we will all find out to our cost if things carry on as they are
But that doesn't answer my question why some are persisting with it on here. Yes TR is a bit Fake, so is Trump but their issues are not. Maybe some are so used to playing the player than the ball they no longer have any kind of reasoned focus?
I'm using it because it's his name
Remind us what you were banned for again?
Because El Presidente is as biased aF. I just threw an insult back at frutos about identity politics gettoizing gays, something I read in the Pink news and the Butt hurt let ripped.