METALMICKY
Well-known member
- Jan 30, 2004
- 6,823
As others have said thought he was largely anonymous which is the sign of a good ref. My only gripe might be the lecture he gave Dunk about time wasting.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Today’s ref Michael Oliver
- Thread starter LamieRobertson
- Start date
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,352
When the fourth official held the board up to show the added time, it actually said 3! The Big Screens got it wrong.
Lush
Mods' Pet
Didn’t notice Burnley’s usual shithousery quite as much and I doubt they’ve changed, so giving some credit to the ref.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
- Thread starter
- #24
Erm said four from my eyes and a few around
Weststander
Well-known member
Us scoring first had an interesting effect. Burnley’s time-wasting and slowing the game down, disappeared in an instant.
mreprice
Active member
Played 4 1/2 minutes added time. Even remembered to add 30 seconds for their goal
Seasidesage
New member
Thought he had a decent game. The yellow/red being the only decision I thought he got wrong and even then its not clear cut as say Andone.
He played over 4 mins. The person next to me set her phone timer when the board went up and announced time up.
It was definitely 4 when I looked at the board. We were guessing the minutes and me and those next to me thought 5...and we definitely all saw 4 on the board.
The board showed 3 or 4 mins. Football really is a game of opinions.
Sussex Nomad
Well-known member
I'd rather be commenting on a ref decision, however bad they are than VAR.
Every time the Burnley number 23 fell over he awarded a foul, which encouraged him to fall over more and more often.
Re the added time, when it was announced on the stadium announcement it was 16:47 on the board and he blew at 16:50. But he didn’t add any extra time for the Burnley goal, which was after the 90th minute.
Re the added time, when it was announced on the stadium announcement it was 16:47 on the board and he blew at 16:50. But he didn’t add any extra time for the Burnley goal, which was after the 90th minute.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,352
Fair enough. Sure I saw three but either I was wrong or he changed it.....
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Maybe you saw Bongs number...
When they ANNOUNCE the added time is entirely irrelevant. they don't announce it spot on 90:00. Could have alreday played 30 / 60 / 90 seconds of the added time, at that point.