cjd
Well-known member
No grudge but I stand by my view that Conn cleverly moved the debate away from the essence of the story (the rights and wrongs of the stadium) and into a fringe area, created by Baker, where he could leave a nasty smell. As you say, Baker made allegations against the minister, which Conn chose to give an airing to in his story about the stadium - the point here is that any allegation against Baker is also an allegation against others and it makes me weep when innocent men are tarred with a journalist's brush.
But you are completely correct - it is pretty late in the day for us to be debating this. I apologise for allowing Mr Conn to stick in my craw.
I'm with Lincoln Imp......thought the article was a poorly disguised attempt to dis-credit the Albions aims and intentions......particularly towards Derek chapman. Water under the bridge...but Conn can go hang himself for all I care. He is far from being unbiased.