Perkino
Well-known member
- Dec 11, 2009
- 6,051
How about a different version of events. Imagine Caicedo doesn't want to move to Chelsea and is not desperate to leave, knowing that after another season of dominating he will be top of most clubs wish list next summer and will be able to choose which title challenging side he joins rather than being stuck at a Chelsea side he joined just for the money.One of the issues for Moises appears to be that his agent makes Charlie Kane look like Mino Raiola. He wanted to move so his agent signed him up to a long contract with no release clause - and if we believe the press there was some kind of "gentleman's agreement" he would be allowed to move. Signing that contract was naive in the extreme.
As it stands though there seems to have been little in the way of noise from Moises camp in agitating for the move - aside from the usual minor social media rumblings. Given as you said he overcame his wanderlust in January may give Albion fans hope of him doing the same for the coming season.
Bloom is playing a somewhat dangerous game though as preventing an elite young player from moving on will set alarm bells off when signing future prospects. Agents and players will be aware of the Caicedo situation and in future may well be reticent to sign for Brighton, or at least ensure a suitable release fee and/or wage improvement is in the contract. The modus operandi has thus far been to acquire some of the best young talent under the promise of first team playing time and a big move. Are we seeing a seismic shift in Brighton's strategy, or is Bloom simply seeking to extract maximum value from this deal? I'd wager the latter.
I don't think we would ever stop players moving on but what we don't know is how Caicedo feels currently and staying at Brighton is hardly a bad prospect for him, especially considering that Chelsea may not play European football for a few more seasons