True.
But @StatBrother, are you allowed your opinion?
I'm not no, but that appears to have not stopped me.
Only a few days ago my opinion was eviscerated by a poster who later made the same opinion elsewhere.
True.
But @StatBrother, are you allowed your opinion?
True.
But @StatBrother, are you allowed your opinion?
I'm disappointed that we didn't land a striker, of course, but all this talk that we are doomed to relegation etc and heads must roll is pathetic given the proper context
Bloom really doesnt need to bid for endearment does he?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
The proper context is in the first three games we've lacked anything that remotely looks like a cutting edge up front.
Many fans have noticed this and noted we are down to one fit striker.
That augers very badly for us given we now have to wait 4 months before we have any chance to rectify that situation.
If it was another club in this situation I don't think our fans would have an issue saying that club is doomed to fail in the PL because of that situation.
It is what it is however, we've made our own bed and now we must lie in it.
If our midfield can't deliver our goals, we are doomed to go straight back down. Let's hope they go gangbusters as they are our best hope.
Incorrect.
The deal sheet submitted to get the extra 2 hour window only contains details of the fee and payment structure agreed between the two clubs. There's nothing in there about the individual player having agreed terms.
I admit the failure to bring anyone in is hard to take but presumably a fair number of these reports concluded that the guy was not for us. How many of these 2000 were genuine targets?Hmmmm, if you've compiled reports on nearly 2000 strikers and fail to sign any of them, the club has plenty of fault in it's process.
If I'd commissioned my staff to find 2 strikers and they produced reports on 2000 potential targets but 90% of them weren't up to standard, I'd first be asking:-I admit the failure to bring anyone in is hard to take but presumably a fair number of these reports concluded that the guy was not for us. How many of these 2000 were genuine targets?
rose tinted Glasses i'm afraid
regards
DR
I laughed at Huddersfield buying everyone back in July in a mad panic. But look where they are now compared to where we are. It's just so dispiriting after the highs of April.
If players are offered the same deals at Burnley and Brighton, I imagine 2 factors come into play.
1: Which team has a better chance of staying in the PL.
2: Where would i rather live.
In most cases, I would guess point one has much more importance the latter for the 18-26 year old professional footballer.
As I've said before, Izquierdo needs to convert to a striker and become Roy of the Rovers.
There are so many doubts about so many parts of our team at the moment that we need a miracle. That's not impossible but improbable.
Jose doesn't play as a striker.
Can you remind exactly who we have played in the first three and who Huddersfield have played. Don't go wetting yourself about their position after just three games!
If I'd commissioned my staff to find 2 strikers and they produced reports on 2000 potential targets but 90% of them weren't up to standard, I'd first be asking:-
1 - Why aren't you concentrating on the specific requirements?
then
B - Ok let's see the 200 strikers who did make it this far.
I wonder how much time and MONEY it cost to scout 2000 players?
You do realize that there is no requirement to live in the town in which you ply your trade!
I didn't state that it was.