It's debatable in the same way that it's debatable that there was a game between Brighton and Middlesbrough.It's a debatable decision that turns on the ref's interpretation of "serious foul play" and "endangering safety".
They will get more criticism if they don't overturn it. Overturning it sends the message that they're a fair organisation that's trying to do the right thing. Everyone already knows that humans make mistakes, and refereeing is a tough job so of course mistakes happen. To uphold it would be a disgrace.The FA look after their own and simply won't leave themselves open to criticism due to the importance of the game and an admission that a key decision was a mistake.
No it ****ing isn't. It's time to ****ing stand up for ourselves and make it known that the decision cost us the chance of automatic promotion, and that the FA should do the right thing.Time to move on
Absolutely agree.They will get more criticism if they don't overturn it. Overturning it sends the message that they're a fair organisation that's trying to do the right thing. Everyone already knows that humans make mistakes, and refereeing is a tough job so of course mistakes happen. To uphold it would be a disgrace.
No it ****ing isn't. It's time to ****ing stand up for ourselves and make it known that the decision cost us the chance of automatic promotion, and that the FA should do the right thing.
They will get more criticism if they don't overturn it. Overturning it sends the message that they're a fair organisation that's trying to do the right thing. Everyone already knows that humans make mistakes, and refereeing is a tough job so of course mistakes happen. To uphold it would be a disgrace.
No it ****ing isn't. It's time to ****ing stand up for ourselves and make it known that the decision cost us the chance of automatic promotion, and that the FA should do the right thing.
It's debatable in the same way that it's debatable that there was a game between Brighton and Middlesbrough.
And I'm using my example as in 'it's clear-cut unarguable that it shouldn't have been a sending off'.Well, in this context I was using "debatable" as in "not a clear-cut unarguable sending off" to illustrate that the option of an extra ban probably wouldn't apply.
I'm unsure if carry over when we get promoted as PL is a separate competition?