[Cricket] Third Ashes Test - England v Australia - Edgbaston

[Titanic]

AT LAST!!!

Finn gets Nevill... brilliant catch by Buttler flying down the leg side.... being reviewed...

 

[Simster]

If Neville is out, then he's a twunt for reviewing that, given that he's already had a life.

 

[Titanic]

He HIT it.. plain and simple... what a CHEAT! Nevill gone for 59

217-8, lead 72... Cook breathes a sigh of relief... that was starting to look iffy!

 

[Badger]

Phew, third time lucky down the leg side

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Thank christ for that.

 

[Simster]

He's a TWUNT.


Fck off you Aussie CHEAT. Cheerio.

 

[Monsieur Le Plonk]

Poor sportsmanship that. Very poor.

 

[Danny-Boy]

Poor sportsmanship that. Very poor.

Chappelli wouldn't agree!

 

[Prince Monolulu]

Love M. Holding...'you say he reviewed as he didn't know if he hit that....well he does now'.

 

[Titanic]

Steven Finn 18-3-76-6

Smith, Clarke, Voges, Marsh, Nevill and Johnson... he has ripped the heart out of the Aussie batting line up

 

[nwgull]

The Aussies really are the world's worst reviewers. I can understand reviewing a plum LBW based on the fact that he's the last batsman and it could've been a fraction high or something, but what is the point in reviewing an umpire's call on a catch that you knew that you'd hit?! ****.

 

[Titanic]

Broad has to wait for wicket 300... Ali into the attack... new ball due in 13, hopefully not something we need to be thinking about

 

[BensGrandad]

The Aussies really are the world's worst reviewers. I can understand reviewing a plum LBW based on the fact that he's the last batsman and it could've been a fraction high or something, but what is the point in reviewing an umpire's call on a catch that you knew that you'd hit?! ****.

If they havent used all their reviews what did he have to lose nothing but plenty to gain, not true sportsmanship but winning is the game or in their case not getting beat.

 

[nwgull]

If they havent used all their reviews what did he have to lose nothing but plenty to gain, not true sportsmanship but winning is the game or in their case not getting beat.

He loses a review for the team. And looks it tit for reviewing a decision that he knew would be upheld.

 

[BensGrandad]

Had it been upheld, always possible, he may have gone on to get a 100+ so well worth taking a chance however slim.

 

[Prince Monolulu]

The hotspot was almost the size of Ringmer, hardly a 'faint nick'

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

I'd BESEECH anyone with access to a betting account to put a quid on the draw, at prices ranging from 500/1 to 750/1. What's the worst that can happen? You lose a quid. What's the best that can happen? The heavens open and there's no more play

http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/ashes/3rd-test/winner

 

[Monsieur Le Plonk]

Had it been upheld, always possible, he may have gone on to get a 100+ so well worth taking a chance however slim.

You and that aussie cheat hold similar morals. Anyone who has played cricket knows when he has had the slightest of nicks. To review it is to show the world on numerous cameras that you are a low down morally bankrupt cheating aussie w#nker

 

[sydney]

fuk off aussie fuk off fuk off
fuk off aussie fuk off fuk off

as many times as you like..........yeeeeeehhaaaaaaarrrrrr....!! monday's gonna be a good un.

 

[Simster]

On comes Boycott to whinge about the batting until lunch.