There's nothing like arrogance from a football manager.

[Ali_rrr]

Knowing Celtic's luck they'll probably get through to the final qualifying round and then get drawn against Arsenal

Fortunately they won't as because Arsenal finished 4th they go into the 'best placed' category whilst Celtic if they get there will be in the so called 'champions' pot.

 

[Pavilionaire]

Yes, and they'll still average 46,000 fans per home game. Hell, Rangers averaged 45,000+ playing the amateurs in Division 3. What will Leeds be getting, or Sheff Wed, or Birmingham? The Scottish league is poor but these are still two great clubs.

 

[Cian]

Scotland's coefficient is so poor because they generally do quite badly in Europe. System's very simple - win or draw and you get coefficient, lose and you don't. Not sure how he can't get that.

If Celtic hadn't got back in to the Europa a few years ago due to Sion's issues Scotland would actually be about five places lower and only get one team in R2 of the Europe with the others in R3. Very sharp drop from the days when they got two Champions League places but the massive coefficient drop from when the year Rangers got to the UEFA Cup Final expired did that.

 

[Leekbrookgull]

Yes, and they'll still average 46,000 fans per home game. Hell, Rangers averaged 45,000+ playing the amateurs in Division 3. What will Leeds be getting, or Sheff Wed, or Birmingham? The Scottish league is poor but these are still two great clubs.

Gates do not make you a ''big'' club. It;s what you do on the pitch that does.

 

[mistahclarke]

I think he has a point.

me too. Whatever you say about the scottish league, you are putting a team that has passed the groups stages in the past with the champions of Malta, Iceland, Northern Ireland, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Ireland, Wales or Luxembourg's finest. etc. Unless I am mistaken, none of those have reached the group stages in the past few years?

I'm not saying that they should get instant group stage, but 3 stages? Considering they could win this game, and the next, then be drawn against the team that finished SECOND in Cyprus last year. That's just a joke in my opinion.

It's Champions league anyway, not 4th place league.

 

[atfc village]

Also entering at this stage Malmo,Steaua Bucherest,Dinamo Tblisi,Dinamo Zagreb,Partizan Belgrade and Sparta Praha all big names in Europe before The Champions Greed League formed.That's just the way it is these days .

 

[mistahclarke]

Celtic (36.813) actually have a better Coefficient than Monaco (11.3) that are straight into the group stages.


http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2015/accesslist/listofparticipants/

UEFA Champions League group stage
Position Club Coefficient
1 Real Madrid CF (ESP) – holders 161.542
2 FC Barcelona (ESP) 157.542
3 FC Bayern München (GER) 154.328
4 Chelsea FC (ENG) 140.949
5 SL Benfica (POR) 129.459
6 Club Atlético de Madrid (ESP) 119.542
7 FC Schalke 04 (GER) 95.328
8 Borussia Dortmund (GER) 82.328
9 Juventus (ITA) 80.387
10 Paris Saint-Germain (FRA) 80.300
11 FC Shakhtar Donetsk (UKR) 78.193
12 FC Basel 1893 (SUI) 75.645
13 Manchester City FC (ENG) 72.949
14 Olympiacos FC (GRE) 67.720
15 PFC CSKA Moskva (RUS) 66.899
16 AFC Ajax (NED) 61.862
17 Liverpool FC (ENG) 58.949
18 Sporting Clube de Portugal (POR) 58.459
19 Galatasaray AŞ (TUR) 55.340
20 RSC Anderlecht (BEL) 50.260
21 AS Roma (ITA) 39.887
22 AS Monaco FC (FRA) 11.300
23 Winner play-off
24 Winner play-off
25 Winner play-off
26 Winner play-off
27 Winner play-off
28 Winner play-off
29 Winner play-off
30 Winner play-off
31 Winner play-off
32 Winner play-off
The 32 teams will be split into four seeding pots of eight, and one from each pot will be drawn into eight groups at the group stage draw in Monaco on 28 August.

UEFA Champions League play-off – league route
Position Club Coefficient
1 Arsenal FC (ENG) 112.949
2 FC Porto (POR) 105.459
3 Bayer 04 Leverkusen (GER) 70.328
4 SSC Napoli (ITA) 61.387
5 Athletic Club (ESP) 54.542
6 Winner third qualifying round
7 Winner third qualifying round
8 Winner third qualifying round
9 Winner third qualifying round
10 Winner third qualifying round
UEFA Champions League play-off – champions route
Position Club Coefficient
1 Winner third qualifying round
2 Winner third qualifying round
3 Winner third qualifying round
4 Winner third qualifying round
5 Winner third qualifying round
6 Winner third qualifying round
7 Winner third qualifying round
8 Winner third qualifying round
9 Winner third qualifying round
10 Winner third qualifying round
UEFA Champions League third qualifying round – league route
Position Club Coefficient
1 FC Zenit (RUS) 73.899
2 LOSC Lille (FRA) 45.300
3 FC København (DEN) 45.260
4 R. Standard de Liège (BEL) 38.260
5 Beşiktaş JK (TUR) 32.840
6 FC Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk (UKR) 32.193
7 Panathinaikos FC (GRE)* 30.220
8 Feyenoord (NED) 13.362
9 Grasshopper Club (SUI) 9.645
10 AEL Limassol FC (CYP) 7.650
UEFA Champions League third qualifying round – champions route
Position Club Coefficient
1 FC Salzburg (AUT) 46.185
2 APOEL FC (CYP) 39.150
3 Aalborg BK (DEN) 5.260
4 Winner second qualifying round
5 Winner second qualifying round
6 Winner second qualifying round
7 Winner second qualifying round
8 Winner second qualifying round

9 Winner second qualifying round
10 Winner second qualifying round

11 Winner second qualifying round
12 Winner second qualifying round
13 Winner second qualifying round
14 Winner second qualifying round
15 Winner second qualifying round
16 Winner second qualifying round
17 Winner second qualifying round
18 Winner second qualifying round
19 Winner second qualifying round
20 Winner second qualifying round
UEFA Champions League second qualifying round
Position Club Coefficient
1 FC Steaua Bucureşti (ROU) 39.451
2 Celtic FC (SCO) 36.813
3 FC BATE Borisov (BLR) 33.725
4 AC Sparta Praha (CZE) 28.870
5 GNK Dinamo Zagreb (CRO) 23.925
6 PFC Ludogorets Razgrad (BUL) 18.125
7 Maccabi Tel-Aviv FC (ISR) 17.875
8 FC Sheriff (MDA) 17.075
9 NK Maribor (SVN) 16.200
10 Legia Warszawa (POL) 15.275
11 FK Partizan (SRB) 14.825
12 Debreceni VSC (HUN) 10.325
13 ŠK Slovan Bratislava (SVK) 8.700
14 FC Aktobe (KAZ) 8.150
15 FK Ventspils (LVA) 7.750
16 Qarabağ FK (AZE) 7.575
17 HJK Helsinki (FIN) 7.435
18 FC Dinamo Tbilisi (GEO) 6.975
19 Malmö FF (SWE) 6.265
20 KR Reykjavík (ISL) 5.350
21 F91 Dudelange (LUX) 4.975
22 Strømsgodset IF (NOR) 4.855
23 The New Saints FC (WAL) 4.850
24 Saint Patrick's Athletic FC (IRL) 4.775
25 KS Skënderbeu (ALB) 4.600
26 FC Levadia Tallinn (EST) 4.575
27 FK Rabotnicki (MKD) 4.550
28 Valletta FC (MLT) 4.466
29 HŠK Zrinjski (BIH) 4.000
30 Cliftonville FC (NIR) 3.225
31 HB Tórshavn (FRO) 3.175
32 VMFD Žalgiris (LTU) 3.050
33 FK Sutjeska (MNE) 2.450
34 FC Santa Coloma (AND) 2.166
UEFA Champions League first qualifying round
Position Club Coefficient
1 FC Levadia Tallinn (EST) 4.575
2 HB Tórshavn (FRO) 3.175
3 FC Santa Coloma (AND) 2.166
4 FC Banants (ARM) 1.325
5 SP La Fiorita (SMR) 0.699
6 Lincoln FC (GIB) 0.000

 

[WhingForPresident]

He could always just keep his mouth shut, do his job, get to the knockout phase of the CL this season and then maybe not have to worry about going through three qualifying stages next season.

If Celtic are so good, they should be able to treat these games as regular pre-season friendlies anyway.

 

[fat old seagull]

The exact hallmarks he shown here......a lacklustre 1-0 win.

Similarly, Celtic also scraped a 1-0 win, late goal.

Thanks for that, my curiosity was just wondering where I'd find those results. Especially the Tel Aviv one.

 

[Leekbrookgull]

Until the last couple of seasons Manchester City have done nothing in EPL or Europe so how is it they are ranked higher than Arsenal or Liverpool ?

 

[Cian]

Celtic (36.813) actually have a better Coefficient than Monaco (11.3) that are straight into the group stages.

Club coefficients determine your seeding, association coefficients and your qualifiying spot (Champions / lower league places for CL; Cup Winner or league placing for Europa) determine where you start.

Consider it a punishment for allowing such a ridiculously lopsided league - if there were 4 acceptable teams going in rather than 1 (formerly 2) strong and 2 joke they'd have a higher coefficient. Celtic should be hoping that Rangers win the cup this year to get them back in and getting points ASAP as the others sure aren't going to do it for them.

Daila needs to realise though that, as realistically the only team getting anywhere in Europe, that if they enter later and then crash out they just drag the coefficient down even further - winning through three rounds of qualifiers is almost essential to keep them where they are.

Until the last couple of seasons Manchester City have done nothing in EPL or Europe so how is it they are ranked higher than Arsenal or Liverpool ?

Coefficients cover the previous 5 seasons only.

 

[Mellotron]

He'd have a point if they were battering all of these teams 10-0+. They aren't. So he doesn't.

 

[Badger]

 

[Pavilionaire]

Gates do not make you a ''big'' club. It;s what you do on the pitch that does.

I'd already stated my case for them being a big club by citing recent victories in the Champions League against Barcelona and Ajax. The crowd figures merely confirm the fact they are a big club in every sense of the word.

 

[Eggman]

Chortle

 

[atfc village]

Big Club

 

[The Wizard]

Smashed 4-1

 

[¡Cereal Killer!]

Oh dear

 

[Jbanged]

 

[Leighgull]

I watched the Celtic game last night, a bit of a come down from the World Cup watching two parks teams playing in a stadium with a single stand running down one touchline. Luis Suarez's brother in law plays for KR Reykjavik and was the best player on the pitch.

Sign him up. Reykjavik or Brighton....you decide.