Only 2 hours and 1 change if you got to Eastleigh. £13 each on a groupsave, would seem like a decent alternative to the car if we weren't in this pandemic, especially with all the traffic getting passed Chichester, Arundel, Worthing etc. I've done the cricket a few times, and my folks live over that way - hence the interest.
I'm going to have to join the queues today. Down to 30 miles in the tank and don't want to miss tomorrows match.
What time did you go out this morning?
I joined the Asda Hollingbury queue at 7:33am at got £70 in by 7:47, I darted into the supermarket to get a few bits and when I came out the petrol station was closed but with a tanker on it!
I think it’s early mornings not evenings that are the best time to go.
After Breakfast of course at about 10
I have resigned myself to an early start tomorrow so thanks for the Info
The BBC are following instructions because they want it to dampen down before the Tory conference?Its very noticeable that on the BBC News web page and mobile news page, there is no mention of the fuel issue at all. Now given yesterday it was almost all that was on there, this would (IMO)seem to be a deliberate ploy to play down the issue to stop people from constantly refuelling every time they see a station that has fuel,
If so, surely thats a tacit acknowledgement that they were a great part of the problem in the first place by the highlighting a minor issue last week which set off the whole merry-go-round, because if they didnt think reporting it every second was prolonging the issue, why stop it now? And if reporting it now is pro loning it, highlighting it in the first place certainly made it a thousand times worse
Its very noticeable that on the BBC News web page and mobile news page, there is no mention of the fuel issue at all. Now given yesterday it was almost all that was on there, this would (IMO)seem to be a deliberate ploy to play down the issue to stop people from constantly refuelling every time they see a station that has fuel,
If so, surely thats a tacit acknowledgement that they were a great part of the problem in the first place by the highlighting a minor issue last week which set off the whole merry-go-round, because if they didnt think reporting it every second was prolonging the issue, why stop it now? And if reporting it now is pro loning it, highlighting it in the first place certainly made it a thousand times worse
are there any logistics experts on here?
I was wondering what the actual best way to resolve this issue is, given that we, the public, aren't going to help by being sensible.
There are a couple of options that I can think of
Is it best to:
1. refuel the country in an even spread, so that limited fuel is going everywhere, but means that within a short space of time its all gone
2.Concentrate area by area and "flood" each area in turn with fuel so that anyone in that area can get it, refiling returns to normal, tankers then go to the next area, and so on.Immediate con is that it will leave some areas totally dry
Im sure there are pro and cons to each, and there are probably a few other ways to do it. Logistically (taking all the emotion out) there must be a most efficient way of doing it
3 hours each way, 3 different trains, and would cost more than twice as much as the petrol (there are three of us).
And am not really comfortable with busy pubic transport, right now, either...)
3 hours each way, 3 different trains, and would cost more than twice as much as the petrol (there are three of us).
And am not really comfortable with busy pubic transport, right now, either...)
WTF. They are our government. Our country needs our government to anticipate problems and put in place measures to prevent or mitigate. I think we can safely say there have been warnings about forthcoming distribution issues for many years. I think we can expect our government to listen to trade bodies and ward off this type of cluster****. Instead we try to wing it. And here we are announcing troops to deliver fuel. And I am not sure I believe that will be anything other than a sop to appear to be doing something.
So when will this particular issue finish for a bit ?
I have to say that last Thursday night I thought it would be all over by the time the match finished Monday, but here we are over a week later in contradiction of all reports I had seen from the Government, Industry etc. All logic says that it has to come to an end soon doesn't it
Or is the reduction in press reporting because the situation is finally getting better and Brighton/Sussex is just a bit of an outlier ?