there was no moon landing .... discus

[Nibble]

Here is the suspect footage. That's me in the footage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1t1xnWcYug

 

[KZNSeagull]

For those of you looking for a straight answer I had hoops. I didn't bother with a sweet desert instead opting for a platter of cheese and biscuits while watching QI. Some debate has arisen however as to the validity of my claims to have eaten said cheese and biscuits. While it is hard to dispute such claims as there were indeed no eyewitnesses except for my next door neighbour who popped round at approx 10:05 to return one of the "romance videos" I had lent him while his wife was away. Upon detailed questioning he was willing to concede that what I was eating could possibly have been cheese and biscuits but upon relaying his eye witness account to a friend of his, a friend who was not there and has not even gained the most basic qualifications that would allow him to make such a bold statement. The friend suggested that what he saw was possibly not the official version and that in fact what I was eating was a soya substitute, packaged and presented as cheese. However, the cracker element he was a little shadier on. He believes, despite actually seeing smartphone footage of the crackers actually enetring my mouth that there probably never was any crackers but what we saw was actually a cleverly manipulated shadow of my pinky finger. The viewer has been fooled. Upon being asked why I would fake such an event he proclaimed that I was obviously fooling my girlfriend into believing I now had a valid reason to enter Sainsbury's under the false pretence that I needed more crackers. He is now investigating the possibility that this cover up goes all the way to the highest echelons of Sainsbury's stock replenishment dept and that it is a cleverly orchestrated ruse to sell more crackers. It is very likely Jacobs are involved although several highly qualified experts have stated that they saw the crumbs from the crackers and that these crumbs could not have been created by anything else apart from a Sainsbury's High Bake Water Biscuit. My neighbours friend claims these crumbs could have been created by agents planting the crumbs overnight. The debate rages on.

Are you sure the crumbs did not come from one of these?



Nibbling on a salty crack at that time on a Friday night would be far more likely, one would have thought? Plus, everyone knows that eating cheese at night gives you nightmares.

I think your neighbour is right - your footage is a sham, sir! You are clearly part of a US government conspiracy to find an excuse for invading Iran.

 

[tezz79]

You are obsessed with polarising this deabate, just because Falmer & Rosa disagree with an idiot like you, doesn't mean I have to agree with them.
All it means is they have a better understanding than you do of 9/11, and other events involving false flag terrorism.

Rosa thinks a missile hit the towers, she's not alone there, in that September Clues video I posted the guy who made it, suggested that the CGI plane may have been used to mask the trajectory of a missile.
Falmer thinks that the object we see on the footage is what hit the towers, he just thinks it wasn't a Boeing 767.

I personally don't think anything impacted the towers, because of the damage it would have caused the pre set demolition charges.

You talk an incredible amount of bollocks don't you, I also like the way you refer to parts of your silly little theory as if they were a fact & then expect us to explain how they fit in with the official (more factual & scientifically accepted) version of events.
You seem to be the kind of person that is easily led & willing to believe anything no matter how outrageous as long as it concludes with the ending that YOU want, which is ironic because you (I would imagine) think you are "thinking for yourself" & "questioning what they want us to believe" when in fact you are just jumping on the bandwagon & being swept along by some absolute f***ing weirdo's with crackpot ideas.

Youd like it to end your way so you twist the facts to fit in with your ending Regarding the explosives.
Your theory is that explosives brought the towers down but admit yourself that a plane hitting would have f***ed up the charges so you decide there were no planes & are willing to believe any old shit that would suggest the planes were not there.
The planes must have been there... They were seen by thousands of people (1st hand with their own eyes, NOT JUST ON TV) but no... Now you decide there were no witnesses despite there being millions in the vicinity all looking skyward after the 1st tower was hit, again just because that would fit in with the conclusion YOU want to believe.

Seeing as you are an easily swayed person have you tried watching 9/11 conspiracy theories being debunked ?
You never know you might find yourself being pushed in the right direction instead of the warped delusional one you seem so eager to follow.
Youll probably find 9/11 theories being debunked on the scientific database that you have been getting all of your "info" from already......YouTube

 

[Capricorn]

It has got a bit distracted - I reckon you would need quite a big stadium.

More maths - if there is no upward component to the motion of the discus, and ignoring atmospheric drag, it would fly about three times as far as on the Earth.

Adding a vertical component will increase that (up to six times), adding the loss of resistance will make it even more. I reckon you would need about 400m.

I suppose we had better get building then. Just think of the records that would be broken, and the interest. I would watch it. And I can't think of any Olympic sport as uninteresting as disus... Except maybe shotput... Now there's an idea.

 

[Manx Shearwater]

Here is the suspect footage. That's me in the footage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1t1xnWcYug

That's clearly been CGI'd by Fox News. I don't know anything about what you ate last night but I do know one thing, it wasn't crackers.

FACT.

 

[colinz]

I asked you before, and surprise surprise you didn't answer. What are your qualifications in physics that allow you to make this categorical statement? I have explained I have studied physics for 12 years to a undergraduate degree level and I am telling you your understanding of the physics of the situation is simply wrong.

What are your qualifications Rolmer?

Oh, and colinz I notice that in a quote of one of your dirbbles that pastafarian included and I unfortunately read you said that "because it is scientifically impossible for them to fly inside buildings".

What are your scientific qualifications that enable you to say this with such certainty? Bearing in mind you don't even understand Newtonian mechanics I have a slight suspiscion that you actually don't have any formal science qualifications at all.

Biggles I thought you'd put me on ignore, you really are becoming a petulant pratt.
You are saying that nobody has the right to believe that aeroplanes cannot fly into and disappear inside buildings, unless they have a degree in Physics. (Which I don't.)

You really are suffering from low self esteem, you want people to be in awe of you because you spent ten fousand quid to become a pilot (look at me I got loadsa money and a degree in fisiks). You post 3000 odd posts on a football forum of a team that you don't even support, so you can find some buddies to have a few beers with. Get yourself a fuckin life

I would like to think that a basic requirement for entry level into university to study physics, would be an understanding that hollow alluminium objects can not cut through steel columns, at the same time acting as a band saw cutting through multiple levels of floors consisting of a 4 inch thickness of concrete, not to mention the steel floor trusses etc.
Can you now see how dumb you are starting to look ?

Would you like me to post some pictures of the WTC during their construction so you can see, how stupid you are ?

 

[colinz]

You talk an incredible amount of bollocks don't you, I also like the way you refer to parts of your silly little theory as if they were a fact & then expect us to explain how they fit in with the official (more factual & scientifically accepted) version of events.
You seem to be the kind of person that is easily led & willing to believe anything no matter how outrageous as long as it concludes with the ending that YOU want, which is ironic because you (I would imagine) think you are "thinking for yourself" & "questioning what they want us to believe" when in fact you are just jumping on the bandwagon & being swept along by some absolute f***ing weirdo's with crackpot ideas.

Youd like it to end your way so you twist the facts to fit in with your ending Regarding the explosives.
Your theory is that explosives brought the towers down but admit yourself that a plane hitting would have f***ed up the charges so you decide there were no planes & are willing to believe any old shit that would suggest the planes were not there.
The planes must have been there... They were seen by thousands of people (1st hand with their own eyes, NOT JUST ON TV) but no... Now you decide there were no witnesses despite there being millions in the vicinity all looking skyward after the 1st tower was hit, again just because that would fit in with the conclusion YOU want to believe.

Seeing as you are an easily swayed person have you tried watching 9/11 conspiracy theories being debunked ?
You never know you might find yourself being pushed in the right direction instead of the warped delusional one you seem so eager to follow.
Youll probably find 9/11 theories being debunked on the scientific database that you have been getting all of your "info" from already......YouTube

Put up or shut up. (the thousands of eye witnesses)

 

[GoldWithFalmer]

I'm flying to the moon later,via my new craft that can pass through tall buildings unscathed,does anybody wan't me to bring them a message back from God?

 

[pastafarian]

I'm flying to the moon later,via my new craft that can pass through tall buildings unscathed,does anybody wan't me to bring them a message back from God?

depends on which god?

 

[GoldWithFalmer]

depends on which god?

me of course

 

[GoldWithFalmer]

me of course

sorry God interrupted things and used my account there...

 

[pastafarian]

me of course

then no not really interested, your a pants god if you havnt worked out you can leave me a message on here

 

[GoldWithFalmer]

then no not really interested, your a pants god if you havnt worked out you can leave me a message on here

impetuousness is a spaghetti trait born through mass unravelling of it's current form,to attain anything moderate to it's original status,it must be drained,rolled out and left to dry-

That was the reply,she say's i must sleep soon,as i am of to Mars next.

 

[Triggaaar]

I would like to think that a basic requirement for entry level into university to study physics, would be an understanding that hollow alluminium objects can not cut through steel columns, at the same time acting as a band saw cutting through multiple levels of floors consisting of a 4 inch thickness of concrete, not to mention the steel floor trusses etc.
Can you now see how dumb you are starting to look ?

He doesn't look stupid, he's right.

 

[Pevenseagull]

I suppose we had better get building then. Just think of the records that would be broken, and the interest. I would watch it. And I can't think of any Olympic sport as uninteresting as disus... Except maybe shotput... Now there's an idea.

I may have missed something, but are you "Capricorn One"?

 

[Pevenseagull]

enough already

 

[Pevenseagull]

in fairness "South Park" is a cunning right wing conspiracy aimed at duping the complacent, ill-educated proletariat into believing THEIR lies

 

[colinz]

He doesn't look stupid, he's right.

Not another one, who thinks that aeroplanes can fly into and disappear inside buildings.

 

[tezz79]

Put up or shut up. (the thousands of eye witnesses)

Sorry but I don't have to dredge the net for eyewitness reports, even if I did you'd say they were lying.
There is plenty of footage of people witnessing the planes hitting the towers but that's no good to you because everything you don't want to believe on the tv is dismissed as CGI.
How about you find footage of people witnessing the explosions (without the planes)
Surely if you are correct then people would have at least the 2nd explosion caught on camera.

Also seeing as you think we are stupid because (according to you) we think planes disappear into buildings, do you think falmer & rosa are stupid too ?
After all they too believe something the same size as a jet airliner hit the towers so I'd like to know

 

[tezz79]

Hang on [MENTION=17480]colinz[/MENTION].... You mock people for thinking it "disappeared" inside yet you also say it couldn't have cut through the building & come out of the other side, what do you think it should it have done then, transform into optimus prime turn it's wings into robot arms & wrap them around the tower then slide down it like a giant firemans pole ?

Your an idiot mate simple as that