tezz79
New member
- Apr 20, 2011
- 1,541
You'd like loosechange, they also think that Boeings can disappear inside buildings.
I've seen it (as I said earlier)
You'd like loosechange, they also think that Boeings can disappear inside buildings.
You've only got to look at the damage some light aircraft have done to buildings to realise that they can fly through buildings & how come you can use scientists to reinforce your side of the debate when you say they claim it's impossible yet when pointed to the fact that the vast majority agree that it is possible you say "ah we don't have to be scientists"
Seriously mate I know the documentaries make it all sound good but it's bollocks ain't it
You've only got to look at the damage some light aircraft have done to buildings to realise that they can fly through buildings & how come you can use scientists to reinforce your side of the debate when you say they claim it's impossible yet when pointed to the fact that the vast majority agree that it is possible you say "ah we don't have to be scientists"
Seriously mate I know the documentaries make it all sound good but it's bollocks ain't it
Actually both towers collapsed in between 14 and 16 seconds but don't let facts get in the way of your viewpoint.
Oh my god the Towers collapsed in 16 seconds, no way can it have been controlled demolition. That's plenty of time for them to have melted.
Hasn't there been a recent poll in NewYork where 80% claimed they did not believe 9/11 was how the media portrayed it. A lot of people who were there when it happened, claimed to of heard loud bangs rather than planes flying into buildings. I don't think you have any idea how powerful the media is in making you think the way they want you to.
Oh my god the Towers collapsed in 16 seconds, no way can it have been controlled demolition. That's plenty of time for them to have melted.
Like when the aircraft hit the Empire State building.
Google - Plane Crash Building - its all faked of course, but there are plenty of images of planes inserted into the sides of buildings, most of them considerably smaller than a 767.
Can the conspiracy theorists please remember that one of our own died in the attack on the World Trade Centre. I'm sure that they'd be delighted to inform Robert Eaton's parents that he was actually part of the "conspiracy".
Have some respect.
Defo not a controlled explosion! The building melted because of terrorists!! It's all terrorist I tell ya! they're cleverer than they look those!
Defo not a controlled explosion! The building melted because of terrorists!! It's all terrorist I tell ya! they're cleverer than they look those terrorists!
And can you have some respect for the now 1000,000 people murdered in Afgahnistan in retaliation. I'm sure the families of those killed would love the news you believe too!
So how many eye witnesses saw the planes that day ?
Thousands saw the second, are they all payed to say that by the government then ?
And can you have some respect for the now 1000,000 people murdered in Afgahnistan in retaliation. I'm sure the families of those killed would love the news you believe too!
Ah !!!
An agenda I see
thousands saw the 2nd plane? wasn't that the one completly coated in black and failed to have windows? What about the first plane? did most people in newYork miss that one?
Yes, the hidden agenda behind 9/11, 1000,000 people dead in Afganistan!
thousands saw the 2nd plane? wasn't that the one completly coated in black and failed to have windows? What about the first plane? did most people in newYork miss that one?
Thank you for assuming my stance on Afghanistan.