No they didn't. Fake news.
Yes they did!
No they didn't. Fake news.
You silly boy believing what you read in the Daily Mail
You silly boy believing what you read in the Daily Mail
Yes they did!
Er no....it voted to remove an existing Tory majority in the HoC when asked to give an increased mandate to the strong and stable PM...and its wishes have been trampled on via a shameless cash for votes deal done with the most reactionary 'mainstream' party in the UK. Not what I call democracy.Democratically voted for the party and PM that they considered would run the country best and most efficiently.
Labour in their manifesto said they would scrap tuition fees.
Excellent. It will encourage more local students to go to higher education, enhance social mobility, increase GDP, pay for itself as graduates earn more (and therefore pay more income tax) and stop universities being to reliant on international students.
Grayling complete idiot as justice secretary and now continuing as a complete idiot at transport whilst May wanders round Italy in a pink frock, what the hell did this country do to deserve this ?
Our future glorious supreme leader has Tweeted:
[tweet]890149718189387777[/tweet]
Have University applications dropped since the increase from 3k to 9k?
From middle class families, no, from working class families, who benefit most from social mobility, yes.
Tuition fees are a barrier to the working class improving themselves. I can't see how anyone can believe that is a good thing.
I didn't vote Labour because McDonnell is an incompetent ideologue and I have too many Jewish friends to support a party that is at best ambivalent to them.
But free education works in Germany, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Norway, average €500 a year in France, €1,000 a year in Spain & Switzerland.
In this country education is sneered at by too many.
The below is part of a BBC report.
Poorer students
The other big concern in 2012 was that poorer students would be the hardest hit by the higher fees.
But this has not followed the expected script. It's been the reverse. Instead of deterring disadvantaged students, there are more entering university now than when fees were lower.
UCAS 30 June deadline for UK higher education shows UK applicants down 4% and EU applicants down 5%
The below is part of a BBC report.
Poorer students
The other big concern in 2012 was that poorer students would be the hardest hit by the higher fees.
But this has not followed the expected script. It's been the reverse. Instead of deterring disadvantaged students, there are more entering university now than when fees were lower.
This is from UCAS, dated 30 June
Do you think £9,250 fees are good then?
And who voted in the Tories and the Trumps?
Democracy in action innit, no matter how much you or I might like or dislike the end result.
Just goes to show how many ' f#*k everyone else me first' people there are in the world doesn't it .
I'm afraid the above is nothing more than human nature.
I have worked for 30 years and joined a small charity that ran things very badly and unfairly dismissed me after a year of terrible treatment. As a small homeless charity in Brighton, it had the highest rate of tribunals against it per employee in the local area.
This really helps - I've not been in work for over a year and my tribunal is soon.
I'm not a chancer, employers should treat their workers well if they do not want tribunals. This has ruined my career and parts of my life.
It's about time we swept the feckers away and brought in a hard left Stalinist government.
Everything else has failed.
We need gulags and huge tractor factories!
The below is part of a BBC report.
Poorer students
The other big concern in 2012 was that poorer students would be the hardest hit by the higher fees.
But this has not followed the expected script. It's been the reverse. Instead of deterring disadvantaged students, there are more entering university now than when fees were lower.