The Ward-Ritchie-Birtles transfer triangle

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
What are people's memories of this saga? It didn't really work out that well for any of the parties did it?

(For younger viewers, Ward was transferred to Forest in October 1980 with their young striker Gary Birtles moving to Man Utd and Man Utd transferring Andy Ritchie to us at the same time - all for similar fees, I think).

Birtles was almost as much of a legend at Forest as Ward was for us - helping them to win the league, European Cup etc. Can't really remember him at Man Utd at all - did he get injured or just flop? Ritchie was an exciting young prospect at United - he didn't do too badly for us either, but wasn't really in Ward's class - and certainly didn't get the Goldstone crowds so excited. Ward's move to Forest was a disaster - Clough didn't really want him (it was Peter Taylor who was behind the transfer) and it was obvious he was never go to be in favour. In and out of the first team, according to Wikipedia he played just 28 games, scoring seven goals.

Anyone remember what inspired the transfers in the first place? I'm sure Ward didn't want to leave - and probably neither did Birtles or Ritchie. All three were highly regarded at the clubs they were at and, in the case of Ward and Birtles, pretty much worshipped by the fans. Bad bit of business all round.
 






amexer

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2011
6,832
What are people's memories of this saga? It didn't really work out that well for any of the parties did it?

(For younger viewers, Ward was transferred to Forest in October 1980 with their young striker Gary Birtles moving to Man Utd and Man Utd transferring Andy Ritchie to us at the same time - all for similar fees, I think).

Birtles was almost as much of a legend at Forest as Ward was for us - helping them to win the league, European Cup etc. Can't really remember him at Man Utd at all - did he get injured or just flop? Ritchie was an exciting young prospect at United - he didn't do too badly for us either, but wasn't really in Ward's class - and certainly didn't get the Goldstone crowds so excited. Ward's move to Forest was a disaster - Clough didn't really want him (it was Peter Taylor who was behind the transfer) and it was obvious he was never go to be in favour. In and out of the first team, according to Wikipedia he played just 28 games, scoring seven goals.

Anyone remember what inspired the transfers in the first place? I'm sure Ward didn't want to leave - and probably neither did Birtles or Ritchie. All three were highly regarded at the clubs they were at and, in the case of Ward and Birtles, pretty much worshipped by the fans. Bad bit of business all round


Straight forward Ward would have been outstanding if he had played with Birtles. Instead he was played up front with Wallace who who was small.
 




Spanish Seagulls

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2007
2,915
Ladbroke Grove
Ward came back to us on loan but Clough still messed him around & wouldn't let him play for us in our FA cup run if I remember correctly, robbing him & us of a possible winners medal.
 




Papa Lazarou

Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Jul 7, 2003
19,358
Worthing
Ward came back to us on loan but Clough still messed him around & wouldn't let him play for us in our FA cup run if I remember correctly, robbing him & us of a possible winners medal.

Ward played in the Fa cup for us that season, he scored the winner at Newcastle. It was the cup Final that Clough refused to let him play.
 




kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
Ward played in the Fa cup for us that season, he scored the winner at Newcastle. It was the cup Final that Clough refused to let him play.

That's correct. Didn't Clough say something like "I've never played in an FA Cup final so why should he?"
 




BangaloreGull

New member
Jun 18, 2011
201
Burgess Hill
My memory was that Birtles was valued at about £1.5m, Ward and Ritchie under £500k, so I think Utd stumped up a load of cash as well. Birtles as you say was a disaster, as was Ward. Ritchie was both very good for us, and later was swapped 1 for 1 for Terry Conner from Leeds who was also very good, so we without a doubt got the best of the deal.

Whilst I agree Ritchie was never as good as Ward I am going to be controversial - we cashed in on Ward because he was past his best and Forest offered us a lot of cash for him - I honestly think by the time we did the deal Ritchie was a better player. The even more controversial thought I sometimes let surface is that Ward was never good enough for the top division. . . I hasten to add that I don't really believe that, but I cant completely dispel the suspicion. Unlike Zamora who went on to have a long term career at the top, Ward scored a bucket load of goals in the lower divisions, but never did it at the top - my memory of him in division 1 is that he was frustrating.
 


kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
My memory was that Birtles was valued at about £1.5m, Ward and Ritchie under £500k, so I think Utd stumped up a load of cash as well. Birtles as you say was a disaster, as was Ward. Ritchie was both very good for us, and later was swapped 1 for 1 for Terry Conner from Leeds who was also very good, so we without a doubt got the best of the deal.

Whilst I agree Ritchie was never as good as Ward I am going to be controversial - we cashed in on Ward because he was past his best and Forest offered us a lot of cash for him - I honestly think by the time we did the deal Ritchie was a better player. The even more controversial thought I sometimes let surface is that Ward was never good enough for the top division. . . I hasten to add that I don't really believe that, but I cant completely dispel the suspicion. Unlike Zamora who went on to have a long term career at the top, Ward scored a bucket load of goals in the lower divisions, but never did it at the top - my memory of him in division 1 is that he was frustrating.

That is controversial! I think,as you say, we did possibly get the best of the deal as Ritchie did quite well - although, like Connor, he never even approached Ward's status with the fans (actually I remember Connor being reviled for a lot of his time with us, in fact at one time he was the target of almost constant abuse). I disagree that Ward was past his best - he was only 25! He didn't fit in at Forest at all - but went on to become one of the greatest soccer stars in the US when a lot of very good players were over there, winning the MVP award - an accolade he shares with Pele, Franz Beckenbauer and Johan Cruyff. I think the real problem was that he fell out with Mullery.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,000
Pattknull med Haksprut
My memory was that Birtles was valued at about £1.5m, Ward and Ritchie under £500k, so I think Utd stumped up a load of cash as well. Birtles as you say was a disaster, as was Ward. Ritchie was both very good for us, and later was swapped 1 for 1 for Terry Conner from Leeds who was also very good, so we without a doubt got the best of the deal.

Whilst I agree Ritchie was never as good as Ward I am going to be controversial - we cashed in on Ward because he was past his best and Forest offered us a lot of cash for him - I honestly think by the time we did the deal Ritchie was a better player. The even more controversial thought I sometimes let surface is that Ward was never good enough for the top division. . . I hasten to add that I don't really believe that, but I cant completely dispel the suspicion. Unlike Zamora who went on to have a long term career at the top, Ward scored a bucket load of goals in the lower divisions, but never did it at the top - my memory of him in division 1 is that he was frustrating.

Ward scored 18 goals in our first season in division 1, I think 14 were in the league, so to say he never did it at the top is very harsh.
 




amexer

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2011
6,832
Wards was good playing with tall striker. However at Forest he was paired with Wallace who may well have been smaller.
 




Ernest

Stupid IDIOT
Nov 8, 2003
42,748
LOONEY BIN
That is controversial! I think,as you say, we did possibly get the best of the deal as Ritchie did quite well - although, like Connor, he never even approached Ward's status with the fans (actually I remember Connor being reviled for a lot of his time with us, in fact at one time he was the target of almost constant abuse). I disagree that Ward was past his best - he was only 25! He didn't fit in at Forest at all - but went on to become one of the greatest soccer stars in the US when a lot of very good players were over there, winning the MVP award - an accolade he shares with Pele, Franz Beckenbauer and Johan Cruyff. I think the real problem was that he fell out with Mullery.

Connor was a HATE figure when he first came, another Ashley Barnes with the fans
 




Spanish Seagulls

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2007
2,915
Ladbroke Grove
Wasnt Clough famously quoted as saying to Wardy " I never played in a cup final and neither are you going to"

That makes it even worse, what a nasty bit of work the old soak could be.

The Peter Ward era was what a lot of late 40's supporters were weaned on. They were great times when considering the bigger picture, I thought that was our level I suppose.We climbed from the old 3rd Division to the 1st & had some memorable times. How wrong I was. I wouldn't change it for the world though. That's what being a football supporter is all about to me, the highs & the lows. Real highs & real lows, not like yer Man Utds, Chelsea, Arsenal etc etc but having said(typed) that they have had some rough times in my living memory. When you consider the top 4 or 5 teams in this country only Arsenal have really been consistantly there or there abouts.
 
Last edited:




arfer guinness

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2007
351
Ward came back to us on loan but Clough still messed him around & wouldn't let him play for us in our FA cup run if I remember correctly, robbing him & us of a possible winners medal.

Met up with the legend that is Wardy in America. The story he told me was he had played for Brighton in the cup and didn't figure in Forests plans so could he go back and maybe play in the cup final. Cloughy's reply was "son I never played in a cup final neither will you" This was the beginning of the end at Forest and he went off to America.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,181
Gloucester
We were stitched up - suspect Clough was the problem (but that's only because I didn't like him.....)

Ward and Birtles were promising young goal scorers, both on the fringes of the England team. Andy Ritchie was a promising youngster at ManU, having played only a handful of gains:
ManU paid Forest £1,250,000 for Birtles and sold Andy Ritchie to us for £500K. Thus, for £750K net they got a striker on the fringe of the England team and off-loaded a youngster:
Clough sold one promising young striker on the fringe of the England team for £1,250,000 and accquired another of roughly the same level for £400K, and made £850K profit on the deal:
We swapped a promising young striker on the fringe of the England team for a youngester with a handful of games behind him - and paid £100K for the privilege!
 






PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,595
Hurst Green
Clough was a complete w**ker. He single handedly attempted to destroy Ward. He never wanted him and Taylor signed him with Clough abroad waiting for a fax which Taylor deliberately delayed.

And to say we sold Ward as he was past it!!!!

Blimey I've read some crap on here but that is astounding
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top