symyjym
Banned
Can you translate and summarise the point in one clear sentence please.
Can you translate and summarise the point in one clear sentence please.
The Truth. Why are your news sources more reliable than mainstream news?
The reaction on this thread sums up your query. You all say and repeat the same old stuff and it's always from the same old users (you included).
The lizard tinfoil hat etc jokes have definitely passed the sell by date, now you're sounding slightly bitter and rotten.
I beg your pardon, I can see words jumbled up and formed to look like sentences and all I asked of you was to translate and summarise the messagae. How is that sounding bitter and rotten
And I have never mentioned anything about a tinfoil hat in any of my posts
I'm not saying it's more reliable but alternative information should be more accessible than it currently is.
I just don't trust getting spoon fed my information from mainstream news which is corrupt and unreliable. The recent scandals haven't given me much hope to be honest with you
Barrel of Fun, What makes you believe mainstream news is reliable?
...You all say and repeat the same old stuff and it's always from the same old users (you included).
The Truth. Why are your news sources more reliable than mainstream news?
Give it a break, you're one of the head leaders of your 'anti-conspiracy brigade' who believe nothing and trust no one! Amen.
Bitter and rotten? I was being nice!
SymyJym, considering more than not you seem very glued to my posts which i don't mind but what's with your anger towards a Conpsiracy theorist? they aren't trying to destroy the world with their lies like you often say, that's your delusional thinking!
I'm not saying it's more reliable but alternative information should be more accessible than it currently is.
I just don't trust getting spoon fed my information from mainstream news which is corrupt and unreliable. The recent scandals haven't given me much hope to be honest with you
Barrel of Fun, What makes you believe mainstream news is reliable?
Not at all, I am always interested in hearing about conspiracies, but I prefer to debate with with people who can dismiss some of the theories.
If someone says to me "I believe in that, that and that, but I don't believe in this, this and this" that helps the real conspiracy if there is one.
On the other hand if someone believes in everything in pure blind faith, no matter how far fetched they sound, and cannot dismiss any, then they have sold out on a rational debate.
Just have to add that the only one sounding bitter here is you by the tone of your post.
The reaction on this thread sums up your query. You all say and repeat the same old stuff and it's always from the same old users (you included).
The lizard tinfoil hat etc jokes have definitely passed the sell by date, now you're sounding slightly bitter and rotten.
I'm working on the basis that a BBC journalist on the frontline will be closer to reporting fact than a website run by a person based in their front room looking to pick holes in things.
Journalists are being restricted from the info they're allowed to know and release. It's not uncommon for journalists to have their laptops confiscated from officials.
Journalists are being restricted from the info they're allowed to know and release. It's not uncommon for journalists to have their laptops confiscated from officials at airports.