Stephen Seagull
Well-known member
Can anyone stick up any of the replays? Why was this not reviewed? How can a clear goalscoring opportunity just be brushed aside by a ref who, for the most part had a good game.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] The Trossard "push"
- Thread starter Stephen Seagull
- Start date
He blew his whistle end of. He was wrong but that’s it
He blew his whistle for the foul before Trossard put the ball in the net. Therefore VAR can’t review.
Stephen Seagull
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #5
I realise this is naïve, but is this not what VAR was implemented for (to review incorrect decisions that could change the outcome of the match)?
It bloody well wasn't when ManU wanted a penalty to steal three points!
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Soft as shite decision, battle of strength and Trossard won.
D
Deleted member 2719
Guest
Trossard was running so fast, she fell over.
Milano
Well-known member
It was a disgraceful decision by a ref who was very whistle happy from the start.
It was silly. Once he blew the whistle I think they cant go back and allow the goal... but he shouldnt have whistled in the first place, just let it move along and then later, if he felt it was necessary, check with VAR if Trossard fouled him... poor decision. Agree he generally had a good game though.
Dirty Dave
Well-known member
In football these days you cant put your hand on the defender's shoulder how Trossard did. Whether it's right or wrong, the defender felt contact, went down and the ref bought it.
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
No he didn’t he dived to head the ball
Once he’s blown the whistle that’s it game has stopped.
Trossard was a bit bloody naive to give the referee a decision to make.
The Wolves fella would have been done all ends up even if he was alone over there.
It wasn't a foul.
It was a soft decision.
But I'm not surprised it was given, in the moment.
The Wolves fella would have been done all ends up even if he was alone over there.
It wasn't a foul.
It was a soft decision.
But I'm not surprised it was given, in the moment.
Or - seriously - that the keeper would have saved it. He didn't really make an attempt, as the whistle had gone.
Moshe Gariani
Well-known member
- Mar 10, 2005
- 12,199
It definitely wasn’t a certain goal. The shot Trossard did would have been saved quite easily.
Who knows what he would have done if still “live” but Albion-adjusted XG was probably about 0.15 ...
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Dirty Dave
Well-known member
I do feel referees should be more clever with VAR, by waiting until the phase of play has been completed, then use VAR to aid their decision making.
If the ball doesn't end up in the back of the net, theres nothing doing, but if it does (which it did today), take a look at the monitor.
That's not refs bottling decisions, just using technology to their advantage
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
If the ball doesn't end up in the back of the net, theres nothing doing, but if it does (which it did today), take a look at the monitor.
That's not refs bottling decisions, just using technology to their advantage
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk