Bennett, Elphick, Dicker.
Although Painter and Murray are important as well
These 5.
Bennett, Elphick, Dicker.
Although Painter and Murray are important as well
Nonsense. The "stats" are that he scores 1 in 2 for us.
Actually, the stats say he averages a goal every other game. It's entirely different to scoring a goal every other game.
He has had 29 starts and only scored in nine games.
He has had 7 sub appearance, which on last count averaged 20mins each, and scored in none of them.
20 starts and 7 sub appearances in which he didn't do what he was hired to do, score goals.
But stats can be misleading, can't they?
Actually, the stats say he averages a goal every other game. It's entirely different to scoring a goal every other game.
He has had 29 starts and only scored in nine games.
He has had 7 sub appearance, which on last count averaged 20mins each, and scored in none of them.
20 starts and 7 sub appearances in which he didn't do what he was hired to do, score goals.
But stats can be misleading, can't they?
I would be happy to get our money back on Murray and get a more commited striker.
Bennett's contract needs extending asap.Agree on Elphick.
Virgo, Cox & Hawkins.
You're being intentionally annoying. You knew full well what I meant. He has a record of scoring 1 in 2.
Just like some people put FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR too much stock in stats.
What sort of twat bothers to score more than one in a game, totally pointless if Acker79 doesn't count it in his personal statistic keeping isn't it!
It's annoying to point out how stats can be misleading and presented in any number of ways to support arguments?
It's annoying to point out how stats can be misleading and presented in any number of ways to support arguments?
Dear me.
When people say "he's got a record of 1 in 2", they don't LITERALLY mean they score every other game then always DON'T score in the other game.
It's commonly used phraseology, as I think you well know. It seems you were (for whatever reason) looking for a chance to be pedantic.