Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] The third goal was offside?









Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
It was offside.

But it’s irrelevant given we conceded three utterly terrible non-offside ones. That’s more worrying.

Focusing on the third goal is pathetic though.
The first goal was offside too. The linesman forgot his briefing and raised his flag. The tv didn’t show a decent angle in the replays.
 










A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,558
Deepest, darkest Sussex
The first goal was offside too. The linesman forgot his briefing and raised his flag. The tv didn’t show a decent angle in the replays.
It wasn’t offside. Lamptey clearly plays him on.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,274
Cumbria
The first goal was offside too. The linesman forgot his briefing and raised his flag. The tv didn’t show a decent angle in the replays.
I think we'll probably have to accept the first one. Even my home-made snip and sketch rule looks as though it was onside.

1709846744617.png
 




LamieRobertson

Not awoke
Feb 3, 2008
48,430
SHOREHAM BY SEA
How is it pathetic? Its a goal that shouldn't have counted and its being rightly pointed out
I’d say it’s pathetic to say it’s pathetic…..we must obey those who know best and of course if you criticise those who are critical that’s criticised ……they are beyond criticism.

Ps looked offside to me and given little attention at the time by the two tnt commentators….but we must not be critical they know best
 
















Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
8,628
Yes. First goal. Easily onside. A very well timed run.

Third goal. Obviously offside. Massive VAR cock up with procedures not followed. Again
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
It really wasn't. Lamptey was playing him on and I suspect Dunk too.
The third was quite obviously off though and I don't see why it makes anyone a bad loser to make that claim
Look at post 28, although you can’t see where the ball is. Lamptey was facing the wrong way and Dunk is anticipating the ball coming in, so why was the Roma player already setting off? His fellow player was well offside, but I’m not counting him.
 


Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
8,628
I think we'll probably have to accept the first one. Even my home-made snip and sketch rule looks as though it was onside.

View attachment 178266
Not the point of the thread. But just look at the gaps in that picture.

Surely this one is down the positioning of Van Hecke, next to the centre circle. We're playing with effectively one centre half and two full backs.

Van Hecke, i'm guessing has been told to be like Stones and go into midfield sometimes, I doubt he would have done that off his own volition. His correct positioning should be 5 yards to the left of Dunk. Exactly where the ball goes.

If you look at the 4th goal, there's a similar story.
 


Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,778
Fiveways
Look at post 28, although you can’t see where the ball is. Lamptey was facing the wrong way and Dunk is anticipating the ball coming in, so why was the Roma player already setting off? His fellow player was well offside, but I’m not counting him.
Yes, I've seen that post. I've seen it on TV a fair few times too. Not sure how it's up for consideration.
 




the wanderbus

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2004
2,981
pogle's wood
Bold to watch us defend for the rest of the game and think we wouldn’t have conceded at least once more.
We may well of done or , as we were having a good spell, we may have halved the defecit. Thanks to a terrible var decision we’ll never know.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here