[Albion] The 'Stick-on Sponsor' on the New Kit.

[Blue and White Tiger]

Just wanted to gather other peoples opinions.
I'm in my 20's and don't feel I have to buy or wear the latest kits. I do buy them if they are nice though.
The new kit, in my opinion is a fairly good attempt. (badge in the right place, nice colours, good stripes etc.) However the stick on sponsor ruins it for me. I'm not too bothered, I have other Brighton shirts.
It just seems a shame that the club will be making less money from me this year due to laziness (probably not the clubs fault.)
Are any others the same as me?

 

[Goldstone1976]

Pretty much spot on the same as me. Except for the age, regrettably.

 

[algie]

Poll fair enough.

 

[Charles 'Charley' Charles]

Where's the option for pre-ordered but returning because of logo?

 

[father_and_son]

_and_son will have the kit for b'day (usual arrangement), however I'd have been happier with a sponsor-less option given the quality.

 

[Chinman3000]

...

 

[Seagulls Downunder]

I think people remember some of the older kits which used to peel off, I have a stick on Brighton & Hove Jobs one and it's still as good as new, could be the iron on quality is far better now.

 

[Deadly Danson]

It's certainly not life changing, it's only a shirt which I sometimes buy and sometimes don't but that transfer makes it, in my humble opinion, the worst shirt we've had. I certainly can't remember one looking so shoddy even if some of the actual designs were a lot worse. It's bad enough that it's a transfer but to make it a different white and so badly stuck on makes it a 100% no from me. I hope they sell by the truck load but it's a terrible, amateurish effort.

 

[Guinness Boy]

Bought it for my son because he's been demanding it and has earned it though good behaviour. Between his under 8s team and the fact he's a STH it'll get plenty of wear. I never get replica kits for myself. However the sponsor on the photo on the other thread looks PONY. Like it was stuck on by a 5 year old using pritt stick.

 

[Munkfish]

This will still be our biggest selling shirt ever... even with the shitehouse sponser.

The only way the club will learn that poor quaility is not acceptable is if people return/dont buy the shirt.

I hope the players shirts arent that shit.

 

[Joe Gatting's Dad]

Sticky sponsor put me off, not to mention the price. The front is similar to last years and worn under a jacket in the winter, no advantage just to have the blue back covered up!

 

[Muzzman]

Here you go... just don't tell the missus why her iron's a complete mess.

[yt]9z4aemfDdAc[/yt]

 

[ManOnTheRun]

I don't generally wear replica shirts but might have been persuaded to buy one for my daughter. I genuinely can't believe that the shirt got 'signed off' by either the club or Nike, the sponsors patch just looks so awful. The rest of the shirt is pretty good I guess. It's a shame but maybe some of the associated training gear etc will be better.

 

[gripper stebson]

My effort from the other thread.

How it would have looked if it wasn't ironed on...

 

[brightonmark1234]

the sponsor looks cheap and crap and apart from that the kit is nice

 

[strings]

It's a shame but maybe some of the associated training gear etc will be better.

It does look better:

 

[Notters]

I probably would've bought the kit if it didn't have it. I probably won't because it does.

 

[Notters]

This will still be our biggest selling shirt ever... even with the shitehouse sponser.

The poll says otherwise!

 

[Munkfish]

The poll says otherwise!

Because NSC Speaks for the whole of the Albion community?

Nike will out sell Erra simply because of the name, More kids and teenagers will simply want it because its made by Nike.

 

[Butch Willykins]

Isn't asking adults that wear football shirts their opinion on sartorial matters a bit of an oxymoron?