Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] The Ref
- Thread starter pb21
- Start date
Nobby Cybergoat
Well-known member
- Jul 19, 2021
- 8,624
Great to hear "the premier league's corrupt" booming around the Amex.
Unless we embarrass them and their sponsors, big team's will continue to get 99% of decisions
Unless we embarrass them and their sponsors, big team's will continue to get 99% of decisions
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,909
It wasn't deliberate or denying a goal scoring opportunity.
That was my thought at the time.
He appeared to scoop the ball away from Dunks head, looked clear to me.
SIMMO SAYS
Well-known member
Quite a few secret manure fans on here tonight 
Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Antony should have been red carded for violent conduct
I thought the ref was poor. Bias would be pushing it, but as things ramped up he failed to stem the tide and lost authority
when it flaired up he should have sent antony or whoever it was, off, and stamped his authority. But failed
Dunks booking was justified, but provoked.
when it flaired up he should have sent antony or whoever it was, off, and stamped his authority. But failed
Dunks booking was justified, but provoked.
Last edited:
lizard
Well-hung member
- Jul 14, 2005
- 3,383
Unless it's against them like Willian?
Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,952
Against the grain, nowhere near as bad as the ref against say Liverpool in the cup and not in the same league as Spurs There were 2 blatant fouls by us - one of which that led to Anthony losing his shit that on another day he could have been sent off for - that he didn't give.
As for the pen, I don't know anyone who saw it in real time.
As for the pen, I don't know anyone who saw it in real time.
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,909
Seems to be a small trend in threads like this. All the decisions that went against us get listed but none that went against the opposition.
Or am I right in believing that we never get any decisions ever and all the refs hate us ?
I must have missed the thread after the Wolves match. It would have been ten had it not been for the referee bias.
Or am I right in believing that we never get any decisions ever and all the refs hate us ?
I must have missed the thread after the Wolves match. It would have been ten had it not been for the referee bias.
horshamite
Now Saltdeanite.
- Nov 16, 2010
- 487
Isn't the ruling that if a player gets booked for a foul then the injured player doesn't have to leave the pitch?
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,319
Bloke behind me said that - if true cest la vie. Still an utterly embarrassingly biased ‘referee’ from start to finish. Must have hated giving the most clear pen ever (that he of course missed in normal time)Isn't the ruling that if a player gets booked for a foul then the injured player doesn't have to leave the pitch?
West Upper Seagull
Well-known member
on that basis do you think Dunky should have seen yellow for his handball for the Forest penalty ?
He let a lot go, probably about even. Seen worse.
Thought he was poor. The first half particularly, if you wore red the advantage was played, blue and white play was pulled back.
He improved in the second half in that respect, but then made howlers around Antony and Casemiro.
He improved in the second half in that respect, but then made howlers around Antony and Casemiro.
CorrectIsn't the ruling that if a player gets booked for a foul then the injured player doesn't have to leave the pitch?
jonny.rainbow
Well-known member
- Oct 29, 2005
- 6,846
Did the physio actually come on to treat Fernandes?
I thought it was just the ref checking on him whilst he rolled around in agony.