SollysLeftFoot
New member
just because he hasnt had choice, doesnt make it a fallacy.
It's a fallacy to call it a fallacy...
just because he hasnt had choice, doesnt make it a fallacy.
With the exception of a centre forward and a right back................
It’s a good point. Does TB want some of his money back now, wouldn’t blame him.
We are not investing in fees or wages to match our rivals. I really can’t see youth players filling in the gap at this stage.
West Ham have just spent £45m on one player, as they did last year - probably guaranteeing mid table or top half. We’re not in the league.
Our level is bottom six, and we’re already in a massive relegation scrap, whether we play youth or not.
................... and a centre midfield capable of bossing games in the PL and chipping in with a few goals ...............
Agreed.
NEWSFLASH: Other teams pick players under the age of 23.
It's bloody common sense, hardly a revelatory post. How the frick it's already accrued 18 likes is quite something.
It's bloody common sense, hardly a revelatory post. How the frick it's already accrued 18 likes is quite something.
It's one thing to bring 'youth players' through in the Swedish third division or whatever, quite another thing to try that out in the results-based cauldron of the PL. It's a crash-and-burn policy that would see him either hailed as a genius or out of work by the end of Autumn.
Alzate
Bless you!
Actually, like many people, I have high hopes for that young man, but I'd far rather he was introduced as a sidekick/apprentice/back-up to a dominant, game-controlling powerful midfielder than having to come in to try and be that person himself.
You're forgetting Baluta along side him
its the right path too, when you look at the fees being banded about for centre backs, not to mention £20 million for young strikers in the championship with ONE good season behind them. No brainer
Where's the evidence of them NOT being within a country mile of Premier League Football? 18 minutes isn't really long enough to judge players really. Is it?Not an odd comment at all. Where's the evidence of any single one of the current Albion youth crop being within a country mile of being 'Premier League Ready'?
What a ridiculous statement.
Hughton DIDNT TRUST u23 players to even be in the first team match day squad until they had trained 30/40 times with the squad. That’s not exactly giving them a chance is it? That smacks of come train, listen, don’t question and then, maybe then you get to travel in the squad and not get used. It’s demoralising and frustrating.
me.
40 training sessions in 4 weeks....
Ok Source the quote . Did he really say it ? If so - I’m not sure what the point is here. Looks like another odd reason to criticise Hughton . Players need a bit of time to get used to the squad. Hardly a revelation especially for those with limited experience.
Anyway he didn’t play players I guess because he didn’t think they were good enough. Perhaps mistaken - but What’s his training regime got to do with it ?
Ideally, now that he has a budget to work with, he will now have the best of both worlds. Make no mistake, Potter has been brought in to utilise and harvest the mammoth investment TB has ploughed into the U23 academy. That doesn't mean the 1st team will suddenly be FLOODED with U23's, a balance obviously has to be struck. But part of Potter's remit will undoubtedly be to begin integrating some of them towards involvement in the 1st team squad.
Be easier to gradually integrate these ‘starlets’ into a side that is performing and not see them as an answer to staving off relegation