- Thread starter
- #161
my dad got the speculation wrong, im gutted, i thought he was always right.
Dads' are always right. You must have misunderstood him.
my dad got the speculation wrong, im gutted, i thought he was always right.
Not at all.
And it beats me why so many people seem to look for the most complicated, devious explanation for every statement that comes out of the club. Why not just take it at face value, and assume the club is being straightforward about it, and trying to follow good practice, which is the impression I get from all the statements so far?
Surely, if there is a message underlying this sentence, it's more likely to be that, in drafting the statement, the club thought: "hmm, given that he's still on holiday, and perhaps not everyone will know that, maybe we should include a sentence in the statement which explains why, despite his suspension being removed, he won't be seen around the club for a while".
Total rubbish, it is not farcical in the least. The club investigated alleged breaches of contract by Gus, Tanno, and Charlie. They have not gone muckraking to the press but got on with it. They have completed the investigation into Tanno which has resulted in the lifting of his suspension. The Albion is still a workplace and rules and procedures are in place to govern disciplinary measure and they have followed them. It is anything but farcical in my view. The only farce is the one being played out on NSC day after day.
Which one? the one of the wife in the mini skirt?
It's not facical in the least? Some of you lot wouldn't question Bloom if he stormed onto the pitch and cut down the squad with an AK47.
I was under the (mis) apprehension that because the Albion had suspended all 3 they had a watertight case. Tanno at least has no case to answer and we will see about the others. Prior to today’s announcement I was more in the trust the club camp. I’m now more in the ‘’couldn’t organise a training session with some cones, Wembley stadium and a team full of internationals’’ camp.
And does anyone REALLY think Tanno will turn up for work as if nothing has happened.
Damn!!! your right as well! there is without doubt one to many "ne" how on earth did someone of my intelligence get that wrong!!!! Private school education......Sorry Mum & Dad
It's not facical in the least? Some of you lot wouldn't question Bloom if he stormed onto the pitch and cut down the squad with an AK47.
I was under the (mis) apprehension that because the Albion had suspended all 3 they had a watertight case. Tanno at least has no case to answer and we will see about the others. Prior to today’s announcement I was more in the trust the club camp. I’m now more in the ‘’couldn’t organise a training session with some cones, Wembley stadium and a team full of internationals’’ camp.
And does anyone REALLY think Tanno will turn up for work as if nothing has happened.
I think the interesting thing in all this, is what they did not say. Tanno has been cleared to return, however as Gus is still suspended they did not make any comment about Tanno being in charge of first team affairs until the outcome of the other 2. Surely he would take control until such time we have a manager back at the helm? But the club made no mention of this
So erm breach his contract or pay the club £ to break it
There are some idiots on this site. Complain that there's no news, then complain that the news makes us a 'laughing stock'. It probably just means Tarrico hasn't breached his contract and therefore cannot be sacked by the club.
Only if it were a criminal matter. Most workplace things are not criminal. Some examples of things that are would be are: fraud, theft, assault, sexual harassment (potentially)....
Note: I know nothing about the situation at the club; simply answering the question posed in general terms.
No what they had was an "alleged" breach which required investigation. It's not a matter of having a 'watertight' case against anyone, It's a matter of getting to the bottom of whatever the alleged breaches were. By keeping a lid on proceedings the club, and Gus, Tanno and Charlie, have done a great job of not turning this episode into a farce with all our dirty laundry washed in public. That they have not rushed to judgment on this matter reflects well on the club in my view.
Given their track record so far I certainly do trust the club to do the right thing, what ever that is.
Who knows what Tanno will do? I know absolutely NOTHING about what has gone on. I am not in a position to make any kind of judgment whatsoever. You can surmise all you like but will have no facts to back it up.
I was under the (mis) apprehension that because the Albion had suspended all 3 they had a watertight case. .
Just speculation but can we read anymore into Vicente and his comments aimed at Poyet following his departure? Have we got some sort of unsavoury culture going on at the albion?
. The subsequent ''Actually, there is nothing to see here statement, carry on as you were Tanno’’ suggests they would have been better off (in Tanno’s case) doing nothing.
The sooner this whole sorry mess is over one way or another the better.