tubaman
Member
- Nov 2, 2009
- 748
That's easy to say with hindsight but imagine if punters were just limited to tickets for two events and there wasn't the level of interest - it would have been decried as a flop. As someone said earlier, the demand for tickets was not expected. I agree that there are too many tickets for sponsors and not enough for punters but that's often the case in sport these days. I think LOCOG did a reasonable job in allocating them fairly. I'm miffed that I didn't get fencing tickets but am going to the BMX, which my kids really wanted to go to, and to women's football semi-final so am not too unhappy. And LOCOG did allow people who had been unsuccessful twice to have first crack at the next batch of tickets, which is how I'd got BMX. There aren't many bods who have been unlucky three times.[/QUOTE]
Hindsight shouldn't be an issue for such a large national event. It is called PLANNING.
As for taking people's hand me down, hand me down tickets and being grateful! I suppose I am in a large minority of people who have attended and supported national athletics events before the build up to the Olympics started so being offered handball or BMX tickets that somebody else didn't want feels a bit of an insult.
Hindsight shouldn't be an issue for such a large national event. It is called PLANNING.
As for taking people's hand me down, hand me down tickets and being grateful! I suppose I am in a large minority of people who have attended and supported national athletics events before the build up to the Olympics started so being offered handball or BMX tickets that somebody else didn't want feels a bit of an insult.