Thanks, they've just said that on the box. Weird, as when they were tied over night they said Laura was ahead because she'd won more, not because her time was lower in the timed events.Tie breaks are decided on the shortest time in the timed events I thought. Just checked.
So, bias, hopes and fears aside, state the top 5 for the 500.Come on Garcia, she could beat Hammer at this as well.
Thanks, they've just said that on the box. Weird, as when they were tied over night they said Laura was ahead because she'd won more, not because her time was lower in the timed events.
So it seem almost certain Hammer will win - then there's money to be made.
Hammer will put more effort in than Garcia and Sanchez though.No, if all goes to what happened in the worlds Laura will still win... by 0.3 of a second by my reckoning. Garcia just beat the time that Hammer set in Melbourne, as has Sanchez, I'm getting slightly more confident but Laura will have to beat Edmonson.
So, bias, hopes and fears aside, state the top 5 for the 500.
Hammer will put more effort in than Garcia and Sanchez though.
1. Trott
2. Edmonson
3. Sanchez
4. Hsiao/Garcia/Hammer
You've suddenly made your previous post seem less than impartial.Doesn't matter though, Sanchez is a sprinter there is no way Hammer will beat her...
Am I convincing you? I'm not convincing myself.
You've suddenly made your previous post seem less than impartial.
Bit shit really, as whoever is better at the 3000 (or whatever it was) is likely to win any tie.This is the cumulative time:
Trott 3:44.604
Hammer 3:43.923
So 0.681 to make up.
Bit shit really, as whoever is better at the 3000 (or whatever it was) is likely to win any tie.