Which were?Great words from Dave to Ned, re doping.
I've just realised something that that has changed my opinion on The Tour of Francis averts.
Here's riding a bloody dog of a Carrera.
I'd be annoyingly happy if I'd dragged a meccano set on wheels around France
t'was more than a little tongue in cheek.Oii!! I own a carrera lol. I know they are not the best but I have had mine for about 8 years now.
It cost 399.00 at the time and is still going good now.
Which were?
It does kind of go with the territory.Great to see the Brits doing so well this year, and hopefully Wiggins will hold on to win the Yellow Jersey! Couldn't believe it when I read that some 'fan' by the side of the road scalded him with a flare - not the first idiot by the side of the road this year either...
t'was more than a little tongue in cheek.
There's a pooh load of 'what bike' threads already on NSC, one more can't hurt.I have thought about getting something a little better later on.
There's a pooh load of 'what bike' threads already on NSC, one more can't hurt.
As someone who doesn't know about these things, I'd think 3 couldn't happen when the playing field is level, which includes if lots were on drugs.There's 4 ways of climbing a 'proper' mountain.
1) Sit there and grind it out, at an even tempo. Wiggins.
2) As above but keep enough back to launch an attack from the point you think you can sustain it to the finish. Nibali, Van der Broeck.
3) Attack from the front, allow the rest to catch and attack again. Keep going all the way up until there's nobody behind you.
4) Don't be so stoopid to ride up there in the first place.
3 is the style that is missing in a predominately clean sport.
It's no surprise the riders capable of this massive effort, requiring massive stamina, and more importantly massive recovery, are the ones who are proven dopers.
But that's the style that smashes the 'diesel' engines of 1, and natural climbers of 2.
Thanks. It would be great if that's true. Does he really know the 4 Brits are all clean? I went off the Olympics due to the drugs, and I've been hoping they've improved, which makes me hopeful that the likes of Wiggins are clean. But I really don't know.It's 45 years to the day since Tommy Simpson died on Ventoux.
When that was put to DM, he replied words to the effect of:-
'Well I'm a former doper, today of all days we can't forget where we have come from'.
'4 Brit stage winners all clean, in the cleanest tour'.
Hindsight being the wonderful thing it is, that style of attacking was the hallmark of recent years doping.As someone who doesn't know about these things, I'd think 3 couldn't happen when the playing field is level, which includes if lots were on drugs.
For a start the racing is slower, and has been decreasing in speed for quite some time.Thanks. It would be great if that's true. Does he really know the 4 Brits are all clean? I went off the Olympics due to the drugs, and I've been hoping they've improved, which makes me hopeful that the likes of Wiggins are clean. But I really don't know.
For me, sport is more about the competitiveness than the spectacle, and it becomes completely pointless when people are doping.
In the interests of putting 'your money where your mouth is', I've invested a couple of quid on.
Bak and Iglinskiy both at 66-1.
Anyone can win today, probably Sagan, but might as well take some odds today of all days.
Kessiakoff for the break again today, I think. The winner will be Sagan if it comes back together, if it doesn't it could really be anyone. I'm expecting low points today as I saved a transfer in the opinion that it really is too hard to call so why waste transfers at a wild stab in the dark.
As an aside, managed to dig out this photo of a 14 year old me losing (narrowly) to a certain Mr Wiggins!
Fantastic great stuff.As an aside, managed to dig out this photo of a 14 year old me losing (narrowly) to a certain Mr Wiggins!