beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,015
What product are they advertising, can't see Sterling Cooper putting this advert forward
the brand, the product not so important as image these days.
What product are they advertising, can't see Sterling Cooper putting this advert forward
Obviously not and that was not my point. Of course we need to rid society of negative male behaviours carried out by a minority of men. My point was that the media increasingly seems to demonise normal male behaviours.
I don't think anybody is insulted by it. It's just extremely cringeworthy and very unlikely to get the message through. In fact it's most likely to do the opposite (as evidenced) and they must have known that.
Therefore it's just cynical marketing targeted at women, who will likely buy their partner's razors.
From reading comments on Twitter, there are a fair few who are insulted by it, not that the loudest people on Twitter are representative of society as a whole, thank goodness. Gillette must be pleased with the attention I think - they may lose some customers, but this media frenzy is surely tomorrow's chip paper.
Women don't kill 2 male partners or ex partners every week.
You will have to define normal male behaviours. I do not see normal behaviours being attacked in this ad at all.
You will have to define normal male behaviours. I do not see normal behaviours being attacked in this ad at all.
Most men agree 100% with the sentiment behind the ads, but plenty of men - and I include myself in this - don't need to be preached at as if we're all naughty boys without a moral compass. The advert is cringeworthy and patronising and I can see it being a massive own goal for Gillette, especially with the growing popularity of online razor sales such as Harry's.
The sentiment is fine but I worry that it can be construed as male behaviour is toxic rather than negative male behaviour is toxic.
You've got to be a complete SNOWFLAKE and thick in the head to be offended by that ad. Talk about deliberately missing the point.
You've got to be a complete SNOWFLAKE and thick in the head to be offended by that ad. Talk about deliberately missing the point.
Construed that way by absolute morons. The ad quite clearly is talking about negative male behaviour. Anybody who disagrees with any of the issues raised in that ad clearly thinks that they are acceptable.
Once again, read the comments. Most people are not OFFENDED by it but are a little PATRONISED by it. Big difference.
YouTube comments are not a good place to read sentiment, that site is filled, much like twitter comments, with absolute idiots.
Earlier you said "increasingly we are telling men that ALL their behaviour is toxic", that's just not true. It's an exaggeration peddled by the alt-right and people that are upset that they can no longer treat women however they like. Nobody is saying that men can't act like men, they are saying that you shouldn't act like a c**t.
Exactly how I feel. It's a shame to see it's got so many dislikes. I don't understand how you can feel patronised (or any other negative feeling) by it, unless you see a bit of yourself in the bell ends Gillette is trying to call out. Given the negative reaction, there's clearly still some way to go.It's good ad. Thought provoking and fits in with their slogan too. Toxic masculinity (or being dick) is hardly on the decline these and it should be challenged. I am certainly not taking offence at this ad, in fact I think it is really rather good.
YouTube comments are not a good place to read sentiment, that site is filled, much like twitter comments, with absolute idiots.
Earlier you said "increasingly we are telling men that ALL their behaviour is toxic", that's just not true. It's an exaggeration peddled by the alt-right and people that are upset that they can no longer treat women however they like. Nobody is saying that men can't act like men, they are saying that you shouldn't act like a c**t, which it seems too many people struggle with.