Hampster Gull
Well-known member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,465
Offials were a joke
I'd rather this had been called correctly so we had 4 extra minutes to chase a winner. Maybe i'm being negative but 1 point vs 0 points probably won't make the difference in an automatic.
Ironic as I thought before the game it's about time something fortuitous went our way like other teams chasing promotion seem to get quite regularly, but no, ended up being a more favourable equaliser than the one in the 93rd minute.
Offials were a joke
That photo suggests the whole of the ball hasn't crossed the line
I did - see my other posthave another look
In the away game they got a dodgy pen
In the home game Barton should have been sent off TWICE. We should have got a foul on Conner for their goal.
It might have been over the line bur Burnley can F u c k right off if they think they've been hard done by
I did - see my other post
Stockdale was also impeded. Whatever happened to defence being protected from fouls?
Burnley were not interested in winning the ball as they put 2 players on Stockdale to stop him coming for the ball. This is obviously a team tactic devised by Dyche and for Keane or Mee to attack the corner.
Sidwell needs to go back to Stoke. Hughton keeps doing it and he'll cost us promotion with his mentally of going from 4-4-2 to 4-5-1 when we're winning. How many times has that cost us points.
Six times this season !
Maybe, but Burnley having 3 points instead of 1 point may well make a difference.
Except that argument doesn't work because (as we saw) when they equalised, they settled for the point and we pressed them for the final two minutes. Which would have been how it went had that been correctly given as a goal.
3. Continually reducing our effectiveness by taking off a striker and sitting back, as per today, yet again.
3 mistakes by CH is going to define our season.
3. Continually reducing our effectivesness by taking off a striker and sitting back, as per today, yet again.