Difficult to make that assumption about a 3 hour film from a 2 minute clip.
Normally I'd be excited by Spielberg but Warhorse was such dross I couldn't care less. I certainly won't be booking opening night tickets!
Normally I'd be excited by Spielberg but Warhorse was such dross I couldn't care less. I certainly won't be booking opening night tickets!
Difficult to make that assumption about a 3 hour film from a 2 minute clip.
I can see this one sweeping the Oscars next year.
I thought it was superb and so has everyone else who has seen it with me as well. He can only work with the source material. The author said it was the best film he could have imagined from the book he made so I guess his opinon carries some weight.
Did Spielberg do the TinTin movie? That wasn't held in very high regard was it? Never seen it but I wish these great Director's of old would stop embracing CGI so much. I know that they are trying to pioneer and tread new ground but what made their previous movies enjoyable was the stunts and the story and adventure, not CGI stuff.
Fair enough, I'm sure I read some pretty negative reviews at the time. I'm sure it made a good income but the general impression I got from reviews was "meh". Is it any good?
Could this film usurp the wonderful Hook as NSC's favouritest Spielberg work to date?
I would think that being able to put "Nominated for ELEVEN Academy Awards" on your posters, billboards, trailers and DVD cases is still a fairly big deal?
I do agree about the acting awards to some extent, but exactly the same could be said for all the technical ones, surely? Its his job to pull everything together to make the film as a whole, no?