Guy Fawkes
The voice of treason
- Sep 29, 2007
- 8,293
Its ridiculous and sums up the backwards approach to transport links in Sussex. We have one of the longest counties in England, with some of the worst roads linking the 2 borders (especially east to west)
There is such an anti car political stance in this county and it is hurting businesses, etc, here. I know of people who choose to drive to Crawley to go shopping because it is quicker than driving into central Brighton and they live on the outskirts of Brighton!!
The problem with this scheme is that you have 3 lanes worth of traffic now being forced into 1 lane as you enter Brighton and lights at the viaduct that prevent traffic flowing fast enough to avoid massive tailbacks onto the A27 at or near rush hour.
You can't imagine this sort of approach being used elsewhere like the NHS ie, there is a shortage of beds so we will close more to discourage people getting ill. Or a lack of Police officers on the beat so we will cut the number of officers and people will just have to use the alternative of not becoming victims of crime instead.
One of the worst thing I have found about htis scheme is that the traffic lights timings haven't been altered since the roads were slowed down so that were youused to leave one set as it turned green, but doing the speed limit you get to the next shortly after they had turned green but now you seem to get every set of lights turning red just before you get there. If the scheme was about cutting polution, this would have been altered along time ago because it causes far more to have cars accelerate and brake than travel at a constant speed (and this also now encourages speeding as people rush to beat the lights changing before they get there) - this also affects buses so not too green a solution there either.
But the whole scheme was never about improving things for car drivers or the environment
There is such an anti car political stance in this county and it is hurting businesses, etc, here. I know of people who choose to drive to Crawley to go shopping because it is quicker than driving into central Brighton and they live on the outskirts of Brighton!!
The problem with this scheme is that you have 3 lanes worth of traffic now being forced into 1 lane as you enter Brighton and lights at the viaduct that prevent traffic flowing fast enough to avoid massive tailbacks onto the A27 at or near rush hour.
You can't imagine this sort of approach being used elsewhere like the NHS ie, there is a shortage of beds so we will close more to discourage people getting ill. Or a lack of Police officers on the beat so we will cut the number of officers and people will just have to use the alternative of not becoming victims of crime instead.
One of the worst thing I have found about htis scheme is that the traffic lights timings haven't been altered since the roads were slowed down so that were youused to leave one set as it turned green, but doing the speed limit you get to the next shortly after they had turned green but now you seem to get every set of lights turning red just before you get there. If the scheme was about cutting polution, this would have been altered along time ago because it causes far more to have cars accelerate and brake than travel at a constant speed (and this also now encourages speeding as people rush to beat the lights changing before they get there) - this also affects buses so not too green a solution there either.
But the whole scheme was never about improving things for car drivers or the environment