"The football season should run from March till October"

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
It's things like this that the FACEPALM is made for

:facepalm::facepalm:

Blatter's so fecking stupid he can't even do a proper facepalm

r254023_1047969.jpg
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,186
Gloucester
Blatter should have his genitals forcibly inserted into a blender. Mind you, even then he'd still produce something that no-one else would want
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,015
i dont get it. whats the purpose? and how do you fit 10 months of fixtures into 9 months? does he actually know anything about football? this is so far fetched, it must surely be a mis-quote.
 


Philzo-93

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2009
2,797
North Stand
Just because Blatter gave that f***ing shithole of a country called Qatar, the world cup doesn't mean they should move our seasons. Blatter do one.

Platini, stop eating Blatters shit whilst he eats the Russians and the Qataris' shit too.

f***ing joke.
 




Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,327
Just because Blatter gave that f***ing shithole of a country called Qatar, the world cup doesn't mean they should move our seasons. Blatter do one.

Platini, stop eating Blatters shit whilst he eats the Russians and the Qataris' shit too.

f***ing joke.

Hopefully there will be a mass Olympics-style boycott by countries or indeed continents not prepared to shift the footballing world on its axis to accomodate the utterly corrupt selection of Qatar as a venue. Time for Blatter and his cronies to be put out to grass.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,827
Uffern
Hopefully there will be a mass Olympics-style boycott by countries or indeed continents not prepared to shift the footballing world on its axis to accomodate the utterly corrupt selection of Qatar as a venue. Time for Blatter and his cronies to be put out to grass.

I don't see why there should be a boycott. We're seeing this through English eyes but for the rest of the world, a January/February WC would work rather well. It would certainly suit southern hemisphere countries (as can be seen by the fact that the Africa cup is in winter), would suit the US as it's mid-season for them, suit eastern Europe as they have a long winter break and would suit the Middle East, for temperature reasons. I don't know about Asia but that little lot are clearly not going to complain.

In fact, the only part of the world really put out by a winter WC is western Europe and even then, most countries have a winter break so could probably come up with a workaround. The only countries really affected are England and Scotland - and as we saw from the 2018 vote, the lavatory attendant at FIFA HQ probably has more influence with the FIFA hierarchy than the English FA.
 


Cian

Well-known member
Jul 16, 2003
14,262
Dublin, Ireland
How would you actually realign the seasons to start in March when the current ones haven't even finished by then? The seasons obviously can't overlap. So would there need to be a nine month gap between the last old-style season and the first new-style season to allow for a March start?

How the FAI handled it was an "intermediate season" that started very shortly after the old one ended. Problem is that it was shortened by changing from 4 or 3 cycles of games to 2 - in England you'd need to change to 1 cycle only which could create some serious friction over who gets to play where.
 




Austrian Gull

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2009
2,497
Linz, Austria
Why would the rest of the world give a monkey's about clashing with the cricket season?

It's like saying we shouldn't play football in the winter because it would be unfair on people who go to watch ice hockey.
 


Hatterlovesbrighton

something clever
Jul 28, 2003
4,543
Not Luton! Thank God
Playing devil's advocate here, but what is actually wrong with the principle of playing the season from March to October.

Granted there are transitional issues and the actual length of the season would be shorter but football matches are played virtually all year round anyway so why shouldn't they switch the start dates if in the long run it is better?
 


I don't see why there should be a boycott. We're seeing this through English eyes but for the rest of the world, a January/February WC would work rather well. It would certainly suit southern hemisphere countries (as can be seen by the fact that the Africa cup is in winter), would suit the US as it's mid-season for them, suit eastern Europe as they have a long winter break and would suit the Middle East, for temperature reasons. I don't know about Asia but that little lot are clearly not going to complain.

In fact, the only part of the world really put out by a winter WC is western Europe and even then, most countries have a winter break so could probably come up with a workaround. The only countries really affected are England and Scotland - and as we saw from the 2018 vote, the lavatory attendant at FIFA HQ probably has more influence with the FIFA hierarchy than the English FA.

I agree that it would make the timetabling of the World Cup a lot easier. However surely by the same token it would have a major impact upon the development of domestic football in those regions that, as you have just pointed out, cannot play football in the summer?

Unfortunately, there is no easy option, and I don't think it's possible to have a fully harmonised calendar across the globe. Putting aside the ridiculous decision to give the WC to Qatar, at some point it was bound to go to a country that has prohibitively hot summers; perhaps we simply need to get used to the idea that these major international championships are football's flagship events, and domestic football will need to be moved occasionally to fit around them.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Maybe its a good idea to see it through our own eyes and fight for something that is in our own interest.

We seem to have lost that skill and been a bit passive of late ;-)

Is it reasonable for Britain to run the season this way ?

I would say not for many of the reasons already mentioned.

So what if it is good for the Southern Hemisphere we are the Northern Hemisphere therefore we should not curtail to the needs of their fans and sporting culture ahead of our own.
 


Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
having attended an early september fixture in bordeaux which was easily the hottest i have ever been in my life, i would love to see how the french league, particularly the southern clubs would cope playing through the even hotter months proceeding it
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,827
Uffern
Maybe its a good idea to see it through our own eyes and fight for something that is in our own interest.

We seem to have lost that skill and been a bit passive of late ;-)

Is it reasonable for Britain to run the season this way ?

I would say not for many of the reasons already mentioned.

So what if it is good for the Southern Hemisphere we are the Northern Hemisphere therefore we should not curtail to the needs of their fans and sporting culture ahead of our own.

I'm not disputing that it's not in our interest to keep the status quo. What I was querying is why there should be a mass boycott of something in support of the British point of view? I still don't see why the likes of Argentina or Angola, say, should inconvenience themselves by joining in a mass boycott as Tom Hark suggested they might do.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
I wouldnt expect a mass boycott either.

I am not sure how FIFA is funded, but again I would expect we remain a net contributor and we seem to benefit little from this.

So we would need to fight for our fans and footballing culture ahead whimsical change from an organisation that looks at us with such indifference.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top