spring hall convert
Well-known member
The irony of course, of invoking 'innocent til proven guilty' in the Janner case is that had he not been protected by decisions that the CPS now admit were wrong twice, he would have actually had a trial.
I'd say 99.
As good a number as any I suppose. Seriously though there seems to be a bit of a salem witch/ McCarthyism mentality on this thread, is there really no such thing as false or opportunistic allegations?
Of course there are false allegations but there have also been cover ups that have meant genuine allegations have not been investigated. As above the irony of invoking 'innocent til proven guilty' in the Janner case is that had either of the two prior opportunities to prosecute him been taken this conversation might not be a hypothetical.
It's sickening that the establishment are protecting these people.
It's sickening that the establishment are protecting these people.
It's a good job for him he never appeared on Top Of The Pops, that seems to be the decisive factor in cases like this.
http://news.sky.com/story/1610295/care-home-resident-janner-was-regular-visitor
So who is the other living man that was recognised. Could this be our member of Tony Blair's cabinet that was and presumably still is being protected?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...icials-told-child-sex-claims-1995-report.html
Good to see Michael Howard using the Leon Brittan approach here. Unless it was hidden from him, we can't seriously believe that he wouldn't remember seeing this file?
I reckon proceedings against Janner might have dragged in bigger fish.
Is it the "I'm a fighter, not a quitter!" MP?
http://news.sky.com/story/1610295/care-home-resident-janner-was-regular-visitor
So who is the other living man that was recognised. Could this be our member of Tony Blair's cabinet that was and presumably still is being protected?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...icials-told-child-sex-claims-1995-report.html
Good to see Michael Howard using the Leon Brittan approach here. Unless it was hidden from him, we can't seriously believe that he wouldn't remember seeing this file?
I reckon proceedings against Janner might have dragged in bigger fish.
did'nt Ann Widdicombe say of him "he has something of the night about him" or something of the like,also he was the HS who blamed prison officers for the breakout of three prisoners from Parkhurst because the walked around with their keys showing and could be copied ................................what from several yards? I doubt you could copy them if you had them in a vice in a workshop
the man was and still is an idiot ................blame anyone but himself.
and bigger fish you say, probably but now as the case has been dropped(a bit like a hot potato) it will be left to the victims to flush them out.
It's a good job for him he never appeared on Top Of The Pops, that seems to be the decisive factor in cases like this.
Slightly off subject, but the case you are refering to in respect of the keys is true. There was a program on Discovery or similar and the escapee was talking about it. On all the doors in their escape route there was only one type of key that opened all locks and he made it a suitable key in the workshop just by viewing it and then drawing it by memory in his cell in the evenings and tweaking it until it worked. It is amazing at times to think what can be done. There was another one from South Africa where a man made over time about 8 different "keys" out of wood to escape, that was just incredible (his door to his cell was a double locked door, the second door of which the lock could only be accessed on the outside, he somehow put that key on the end of a broom to open it). The ingenuity of some people at times is just unreal.