One comment from their forum
''Seen a few pre-match comments from Brighton fans, didn’t realise that for a club that has literally no honours of significance to their name, they’re rather above their station! ''
Also another post re JR ...''as he was found not guilty'' Wrong!
One comment from their forum
''Seen a few pre-match comments from Brighton fans, didn’t realise that for a club that has literally no honours of significance to their name, they’re rather above their station! ''
Also another post re JR ...''as he was found not guilty'' Wrong!
He was found “not guilty” but only because there was no independent evidence. He was certainly not found “innocent”, nor was he “cleared”.Also another post re JR ...''as he was found not guilty'' Wrong!
He was found “not guilty” but only because there was no independent evidence. He was certainly not found “innocent”, nor was he “cleared”.
Gabby Logan will be apoplectic.As they’re challenging for promotion in the Championship that wouldn’t surprise me. The rewards for going up are far greater than a good cup run.
He was found “not guilty” .
Without mentioning the source. Noddy at best and I am intrigued if there is any kind of copyright-like issues with public forums. I am sure the material is fair game if a source is given but passing off opinions as if you collected them yourself seems a bit dodgy. Highly unlikely to be illegal but poor show nonetheless.Is this really a serious paper like the Argus (no laughter please). I mean they've quote fans off our forum?! Including me. Good grief.
Moore has asked our fans not to boo Rodriguez
**** that he is getting it big time.
I fully expect it to be Hardingesque
Lazy lazy journalism, take a few quotes off twitter when the draw was made and add in CHs comments from the clubs website and a story.
The actual verdict was "Not Proven".
One of the most nauseating aspects of the whole affair was Rodriguez gobbing off to all and sundry after this verdict about how happy he was that "his name had been cleared", when it most certainly was not. Only the hard of thinking took this verdict as meaning he was innocent.
I'd be amazed if Rodriguez didn't get a royal five star pantomime booing.
He was found “not guilty” but only because there was no independent evidence. He was certainly not found “innocent”, nor was he “cleared”.
Is this really a serious paper like the Argus (no laughter please). I mean they've quote fans off our forum?! Including me. Good grief.
Without mentioning the source. Noddy at best and I am intrigued if there is any kind of copyright-like issues with public forums. I am sure the material is fair game if a source is given but passing off opinions as if you collected them yourself seems a bit dodgy. Highly unlikely to be illegal but poor show nonetheless.
Hopefully their goalkeeper only has a license to spill.
...I'll get me coat.