USA beating Pakistan at cricket this year must be up there.
Went for USA beating England.
Went for USA beating England.
January 5th, 1971. 100-99. Obviously the Generals were just part of the act, the stooges, but that night the Globetrotters lost track of the score. They realised they were losing with two minutes to go, they rallied but couldn't win. I do believe that the Globetrotter organisation sacked some/all of the Generals team as I think beating the Globetrotters put them in breach of contract!The Harlem Globetrotters lost? lol, is that a joke?
Lovely stuff, thanks for that!January 5th, 1971. 100-99. Obviously the Generals were just part of the act, the stooges, but that night the Globetrotters lost track of the score. They realised they were losing with two minutes to go, they rallied but couldn't win. I do believe that the Globetrotter organisation sacked some/all of the Generals team as I think beating the Globetrotters put them in breach of contract!
Technically the poll option is wrong though. The 'Generals' played under a number of names and that night they were playing as the New Jersey Reds. Also it's possible that they won other matches prior to that, but the score was never a big thing.
The other (slightly) interesting thing is I have no clue how I know that as I have zero interest in basketball - although I did see the Globetrotters at the old 'Empire Pool' at Wembley in the days of Meadowlark Lemon.
EDIT: Just googled it and my memory is pretty good! Couldn't see anything about the aftermath though (where I believe they got sacked). Out of all the useful stuff I learned at school (and since) that I've forgotten I have no idea why that useless bit of information has stuck in my head.
I think England fielded a weaker side, and rested the better players. As we see every year in the FA cup, this can allow a supposedly weak side a chance.USA beating England 1-0 in 1950. It was before satellite broadcasting, so the match wasn't live, and apparently one newspaper, unable to believe the score that had come down the wire, printed the result as 10-1 to England. At the time it was the greatest of shocks.
Maybe in retrospect it wasn't quite the shock it appeared then because as per usual we weren't nearly as good as we thought we were. It was our first World Cup and the assumption was that, being England the inventors of football and finally deigning to take part, we would waltz home with the trophy. After all we had the players, Matthews, Finney, Mannion, Mortensen, Wright, Milburn etc, so how could we not win? (It was a lesson in hubris that of course we've never learnt).
I actually think this counts against it in the "shocking upset" stakes.Like many I’m with Leicester. Anyone can have an off day but for a whole season PL after being relegation fodder months before.
Gives everyone hope
Good thread Crodo. Sensible. Interesting question. Some good options.Just read that the mighty USA basketball team came within a hairs breadth of losing to South Sudan in a warm up for the Paris Olympics.
‘We were embarrassed at halftime’: US relieved after escape against underdogs South Sudan
The US eked out a late 101-100 win thanks to a late LeBron James layup, staving off one of the biggest upsets in basketball historywww.theguardian.com
This got myself and the chaps at the Ship Inn contemplating what is the biggest upset in the history of Sport?
I saw on Sports Illustrated last night that in 1992, the USA "Dream Team" faced only 9 other NBA players on Olympic rosters - this year there are 61 NBA players spread across the competing nations. No surprise the gap is closing - and wouldn't be surprised if the US doesn't win Olympic Gold this year.Just read that the mighty USA basketball team came within a hairs breadth of losing to South Sudan in a warm up for the Paris Olympics.
‘We were embarrassed at halftime’: US relieved after escape against underdogs South Sudan
The US eked out a late 101-100 win thanks to a late LeBron James layup, staving off one of the biggest upsets in basketball historywww.theguardian.com
This got myself and the chaps at the Ship Inn contemplating what is the biggest upset in the history of Sport?
Agree. Sport is brilliant becuase there's always the potential for an upset on the day, whether that's because the underdogs play the game of their lives or the favourites have a bad day, or a combination of both. To manage such an upset over a 38 game season is incredible.Has to be Leicester because it wasn’t a one off event
Agree. Sport is brilliant becuase there's always the potential for an upset on the day, whether that's because the underdogs play the game of their lives or the favourites have a bad day, or a combination of both. To manage such an upset over a 38 game season is incredible.
The pre-event bookies' odds are a fairly objective way to measure these upsets. Leicester were 5000-1, and I can't imagine that any of the others listed were even close to that.
I Googled this, as I couldn't believe that they'd played each other that many times in their 100 year history. The hit did however suggest that it's 13,000 victories by the Globe Trotters and only 6 wins for Washington, so true odds 2167 - 1.The Harlem Globetrotters are said to have beaten the Washington Nationals more than 14,000 times and the Nationals (or in a different guise depending on the city they were paying in) so I'd have said if the bookies were offering odds on the Nationals to win it would be in excess of 5,000/1.
Hmm. I'm not sure. It was exactly the same team that beat Chile 2-0 in the opening game, as the selectors (the manager, Walter Winterbottom didn't actually pick the side) didn't want to change a winning team. After the USA debacle they did make four changes for the next game though - all to no avail as we lost 0-1 to Spain and went out at the group stage.I think England fielded a weaker side, and rested the better players. As we see every year in the FA cup, this can allow a supposedly weak side a chance.
Not sure you can count anything with Globetrotters as they were predominantly an exhibition team with most games scripted.I Googled this, as I couldn't believe that they'd played each other that many times in their 100 year history. The hit did however suggest that it's 13,000 victories by the Globe Trotters and only 6 wins for Washington, so true odds 2167 - 1.
I'm struggling to see how they managed that many fixtures though. That's something like 2-3 games a week!