The Bible film on the telly now

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
Noah lived approx 4000 BC so 6000 years ago, considering dinosaurs were lost in the last ice age, it's a no brainer

The last ice-age was about 10,000 years ago. The general concensus for the age of the dinosaur ended 65m years ago (barring some still living today, e.g. crocodiles). I think they were well gone by the last ice-age (give or take 64,990,000 years).
 




Tyrone Biggums

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2006
13,498
Geelong, Australia
It's actually not that complicated.

Adam is a representation of man, Eve is a representation of woman.

Meaning there were many other "adam" and "eves" in existance.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,023
It's actually not that complicated.

Adam is a representation of man, Eve is a representation of woman.

yes, exactly. people are not supposed to take the bible literally. its all allegory and metaphor. Except the parts are supposed to be taken literally. they aren't allegory or metaphor at all.

you can tell the difference because its obvious where you are supposed to take it as literal truth and when not, and depending on which Abrahamic faith, denomination, or sub group thereof, you belong to.
 


Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,762
at home
so when the bible says Adam and Eve were the first man and woman on earth, actually it was fibbing as there was many of them scattered around ( probably in Africa and Siberia).
 


Tom Bombadil

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2003
6,107
Jibrovia
It's actually not that complicated.

Adam is a representation of man, Eve is a representation of woman.

Meaning there were many other "adam" and "eves" in existance.

And were all these Adams and Eves kicked out of eden?
 




Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
yes, exactly. people are not supposed to take the bible literally. its all allegory and metaphor. Except the parts are supposed to be taken literally. they aren't allegory or metaphor at all.

you can tell the difference because its obvious where you are supposed to take it as literal truth and when not, and depending on which Abrahamic faith, denomination, or sub group thereof, you belong to.

Alternatively, it's religion, so all complete rubbish.
 








bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
so when the bible says Adam and Eve were the first man and woman on earth, actually it was fibbing as there was many of them scattered around ( probably in Africa and Siberia).

Shhh ! it was rewritten by Hans Christain Anderson so simple people would read it but that's a secret okay ?
 












skipper734

Registered ruffian
Aug 9, 2008
9,189
Curdridge
Here is a shot from a documentary that was made at the time, of the Ark under construction.

noah-evan-4.jpg



Our photographer also caught God giving the instuction book to Noah.

evan-almighty-008.jpg
 




Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
So the answer is his wife was either his sister or a niece. While not such a pleasant thought these days, while they were so close to perfection and with God's protection, there would have been no birth defects caused by a close family link.

There are some parts of the World where that sort of behaviour is deemed totally acceptable...though I won't name them for fear of upsetting anyone who comes from Texas or Norfolk!
 




Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,160
Truro
Our photographer also caught God giving the instuction book to Noah.

evan-almighty-008.jpg

Was he the first black God? Got re-elected, if I recall correctly.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top