poidy
Well-known member
- Aug 3, 2009
- 1,849
What’s the verdict from those on NSC that subscribe to the Athletic?
I’ve had it a year now and I’ll be honest I’ve been incredibly disappointed with the Brighton content.
Nothing personal to the journalist in question but I just find the content lacks substance and the writing style does little to draw you in.
I’ve read some brilliant long reads over the last 12 months which have been original, well researched and wouldn’t be found on any other platform.
The articles I’ve seen on Brighton though have lacked that depth and offer nothing different to what you can find within the Argus.
Shame, as there’s so much scope for creative license which isn’t being exploited at the moment.
What’s the verdict from other NSC’ers?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve had it a year now and I’ll be honest I’ve been incredibly disappointed with the Brighton content.
Nothing personal to the journalist in question but I just find the content lacks substance and the writing style does little to draw you in.
I’ve read some brilliant long reads over the last 12 months which have been original, well researched and wouldn’t be found on any other platform.
The articles I’ve seen on Brighton though have lacked that depth and offer nothing different to what you can find within the Argus.
Shame, as there’s so much scope for creative license which isn’t being exploited at the moment.
What’s the verdict from other NSC’ers?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk