…and you could say this guy is allegedly a right tosser
Attempting to toss a tortilla would certainly leave egg on your face.
…and you could say this guy is allegedly a right tosser
I think if I had celebrated and grabbed my nether regions next to the queen and her daughter I might have considered my position regardless.He certainly is discovering that as there are clearly lots of agendas being played out around this case.
My posts on this subject clearly stated his lip kiss was innapropriate and wrong BUT, in the context of an epic celebration, perhaps an error not neccaserrily worthy of an automatic social media pile on/cancelling, especially after an apology.
As for the comment around consent, I don't believe for one minute that any member of the outrage police will be reporting that horse owner for sexual assault (clearly in that moment no consent from him) or believe anyone would have made a fuss/ screamed sexual assault if she had planted a kiss on his lips in wild celebration. Anyone saying otherwise is a bit of a fibber.
I can see why people tire of debate, or demonstrably show they don’t have the skills to. You’ve asserted this man is a rapist (evidence?), used a belittling derogatory and ironically sexist term (man’s planning), and dismissed their difference of opinion in an overly aggressive patronising manner with all the usual buzzwords of todays binary arguments such as ‘entitled’, ‘misogyny’, ‘Neanderthals’ and so forth. Surely you’re better than this? If you are, you’re not coming across as.As soon as this thread was started, I guessed there would be a few posters, predictably @Wokeworrier and @goldstone, either Mansplaining, offering some kind of defence for Rubiales' 'kiss', suggesting that it wasn't really serious, arguing that it was "taken out of context", implying that the female victim needs to loosen-up or develop a sense of humour, or that Rubiales' is the latest victim of the Woke mob and 'cancel culture'.
Classic 'defence' of unacceptable and rapey bloke behaviour towards a woman, and the usual tactic of portraying the female victim as the aggressor, and the male perpetrator as the innocent or misunderstood victim: "Blimey, what's the world coming too; you can't even snog or grope a bird in public these days without the men-hating feminazis and Woke-mob objecting and demanding your head on a silver plate. OK, she said 'No', but I knew the prick-tease wanted it really, so I assumed that she really meant 'Yes'".
The men defending Rubiales are doubtless the type who enjoy 'bantz' which is derogatory about women, or view women primarily or solely as sex-objects, but claim "Me? I love women. I ain't gay." Yet by their words and actions, they reveal their underlying misogyny and sense of male entitlement towards women.
Fortunately, most Neanderthals eventually evolved into reasonably decent and intelligent human beings; it's just that few have not yet caught up with the rest of us.
Judging by the way he grabbed his crotch, it looks like he is well hanged.Hanged.
Not really relevant though, is it ? If she turns out to be an alien then different cultural norms might apply. There, I’ve speculated as well.Exactly. If it does turn out that way there is going to be a lot of Spanish omelette on faces.
I can't remember ever having to grab and hold my partner's head so that they couldn't resist a forcible kiss in any of the relationships I have had.I've been following this thread right from the start and must say i respect every ones opinion on this forum. I've not commented until now, but has anyone considered that the pair of them might be involved in an Affaire d'amour. Just a thought worth mentioning.
Huh?Exactly. If it does turn out that way there is going to be a lot of Spanish omelette on faces.
Rubiales nextJorge Vilda: Spanish federation sacks World Cup-winning coach amid Luis Rubiales kiss row
Jorge Vilda, Spain's Women's World Cup-winning head coach, has been sacked amid the ongoing Luis Rubiales kiss row.www.bbc.co.uk
Jorge Vilda: Spanish federation sacks World Cup-winning coach amid Luis Rubiales kiss row
Jorge Vilda, Spain's Women's World Cup-winning head coach, has been sacked amid the ongoing Luis Rubiales scandal.
Spain's win was overshadowed by the country's football federation president Rubiales kissing forward Jenni Hermoso, which she said was not consensual.
Most of Vilda's coaching staff resigned and 81 players refused to play for Spain in the aftermath.
Rubiales has refused to resign but has been provisionally suspended by Fifa, football's world governing body.
Not so surprising when it turned out he sexually assaulted the assistant coach himself.Bizarre that the team manager is sacked before the President of the Spanish FA but I guess that's all the interim chappie can do at the moment. Looks like Rubiales still intends to tough it out, rather insanely.
I'm not going to judge from that particular half-video personally. It's only half a slow mo video for starters - how does his hand get there in the first instance? What comment is there from the women you say is assaulted? (there is none in the article). He does seem a rather unsavoury character from what I've read (continuing the previous problems of male coaches entering player bedrooms unannounced and without knocking for starters) and I'm glad they have sacked him and hopefully changing the whole set up - my surprise I commented above is only that he has gone before Rubiales not that he has gone.Not so surprising when it turned out he sexually assaulted the assistant coach himself.
Spain boss appears to grab female coach's breast during World Cup celebrations
The Spanish national team manager has been heavily scrutinised throughout the tournament after allegations of inappropriate behaviour from current and former playerswww.mirror.co.uk
They did what? On what grounds?Yep, I was reading earlier that the Spanish football authorities have today activated their sexual violence protocol. This is one day after threatening to launch legal proceedings against the victim.
The whole point of dealing with exploitation of power imbalance is that the lack of anything being said at the time is meaningless.I'm not going to judge from that particular half-video personally. It's only half a slow mo video for starters - how does his hand get there in the first instance? What comment is there from the women you say is assaulted? (there is none in the article). He does seem a rather unsavoury character from what I've read (continuing the previous problems of male coaches entering player bedrooms unannounced and without knocking for starters) and I'm glad they have sacked him and hopefully changing the whole set up - my surprise I commented above is only that he has gone before Rubiales not that he has gone.
Sexual violence.They did what? On what grounds?
They accused the victim of sexual violence? How does that work - what evidence is there for such a claim?Sexual violence.
Yes I wouldn't disagree - has she said anything at all? Situations that occur depend on the viewpoint of the alleged victim because an individual has different tolerances and personally I can't put my viewpoint on it without hearing theirs. When I viewed the Rubiales kissing of all the players live at the time I thought "crikey bit much mate have you been on the coke at half time, jesus steady on" - if all of those women had genuinely said then, later and now "not bothered it's a Spanish thing I'm comfortable with" then imo the context is different.The whole point of dealing with exploitation of power imbalance is that the lack of anything being said at the time is meaningless.
No, they did an about turn and initiated an investigation into Rubiales for sexual violence. My post was about the complete change of tack in 24 hours.They accused the victim of sexual violence? How does that work - what evidence is there for such a claim?