- Thread starter
- #141
LBW given this time... but looked leggy to me... only has to be clipping...
and IT IS!!!!
Green gone for 16
254-6
and IT IS!!!!
Green gone for 16
254-6
He's not though is he, he's a poor man's Andrew Flintoff, except against us!!Can see Randy Marsh getting another ton Very good batsman.
‘just clipping’
It’s called LEG BEFORE WICKET, the ball was hitting the stumps so it’s rightfully out and good decision by the umpire, makes me laugh when pundits act like he’s unlucky to be given out because it’s only clipping half a bail
There’s always going to be an element of doubt, you give an LBW decision if you think the batsman has stopped the ball hitting any part of the stumps with his pad.There was clearly doubt to be had - we were lucky the umpire gave that one - especially as earlier ones which were CLATTERING the stumps were not given.
There’s always going to be an element of doubt, you give an LBW decision if you think the batsman has stopped the ball hitting any part of the stumps with his pad.
DRS has made people view LBW decisions being given as unlucky if it’s only clipping, it’s not.
That’s the equivalent of a striker missing 26 sitters then scoring one goal and going HA have that haters.Take that Bairstow haters !!!!!
We will have to agree to disagree. Brilliant cricketer and really important component of this team. You don’t drop someone of his ability so easily. Some posters on here want him to fail.That’s the equivalent of a striker missing 26 sitters then scoring one goal and going HA have that haters.
It’s a fantastic catch, doesn’t change the fact he shouldn’t be in the team.