Toffs not happy.
Did I miss this photo from yesterday being discussed ?
I don't know how anyone could question his place in the side. His attitude, his selflessness, everything. Even when not scoring runs he is great value. A generational cricketer.People sometimes question Stokes’ place in the side, but this is why he’s there, nobody else in this England setup could play this sort of innings, probably nobody in world cricket could do it
I think there's a better comparison with this dismissal:
And this is what McCullum had to say about it years later.
He said he did the same to Warner in the first test.Obviously reported elsewhere but saw Cummins on the ITV news standing by the appeal and stating that Bairstow had done the self same thing in the 2019 series and in the First Test at Edgbaston?
Is he correct?
I don't think he successfully achieved it, but my creaking brain seems to be telling me England have attempted such things before.Obviously reported elsewhere but saw Cummins on the ITV news standing by the appeal and stating that Bairstow had done the self same thing in the 2019 series and in the First Test at Edgbaston?
Is he correct?
3 mcc members suspended,a few on here should be suspended too
There may be a thread for that. A very private one. I think you have to send a message before you can join.3 mcc members suspended,a few on here should be suspended too
Did I miss this photo from yesterday being discussed ?
I tried to find a description of Srikkanth's dismissal, the best I can find is this article in hindi:The closest comparison that I recall goes back to 1981, that glorious year, when I discovered the game. I listened in the early hours to the Indian tour on TMS. The fact that I loved hearing what was probably the dullest series ever means this was a 'till death do us part' marriage.
In Bombay, Kris Srikanth was having an excellent debut and was ran out by John Emburey after leaving the crease in the same way as today. Gavaskar, who would have captain, has always has issues with the English being preachy- especially after Bob Taylor was recalled when claiming he didn't nick a ball a year earlier. I think he's right, we do have form and in fairness, especially when we look at the eventual outcome of the Bell incident, I've always found the Indians, although not perfect, to lead the way in the 'spirit of cricket'.
It was interesting how Morgan and Strauss had little sympathy today. Same for me. Us English do hypocrisy better than anyone else. I didn't like what I saw, and I wouldn't have allowed it at village level. But I wouldn't cry 'cheat' at Test match or ODI level. England has as much history as anyone else and less goodwill than some.
Is a batsman not walking when they are caught against the spirit of the game ? Maybe we should ask Stuart Broad You can see what I mean about a value needing to be universally applied before it gets judged under the 'spirit of the game' law.
Still, it adds spice to the affair and it's great entertainment. On that we can all agree.
That's why Jacob Rees-Mogg still employs his.A good spanking from nanny is in order, you naughty boys.
I think most people on this thread get that. I certainly do.FFS Can people stop saying the Aussies didn't cheat. NOBODY has actually accused them of that and if they have they don't know the rules. The debate to be had is the around the spirit of the game
Actually, it just occurred to me that the best measure of how long ago that Bombay test took place is that not only was it before I was born, it was before James Anderson was born.The closest comparison that I recall goes back to 1981, that glorious year, when I discovered the game. I listened in the early hours to the Indian tour on TMS. The fact that I loved hearing what was probably the dullest series ever means this was a 'till death do us part' marriage.
In Bombay, Kris Srikanth was having an excellent debut and was ran out by John Emburey after leaving the crease in the same way as today. Gavaskar, who would have captain, has always has issues with the English being preachy- especially after Bob Taylor was recalled when claiming he didn't nick a ball a year earlier. I think he's right, we do have form and in fairness, especially when we look at the eventual outcome of the Bell incident, I've always found the Indians, although not perfect, to lead the way in the 'spirit of cricket'.
It was interesting how Morgan and Strauss had little sympathy today. Same for me. Us English do hypocrisy better than anyone else. I didn't like what I saw, and I wouldn't have allowed it at village level. But I wouldn't cry 'cheat' at Test match or ODI level. England has as much history as anyone else and less goodwill than some.
Is a batsman not walking when they are caught against the spirit of the game ? Maybe we should ask Stuart Broad You can see what I mean about a value needing to be universally applied before it gets judged under the 'spirit of the game' law.
Still, it adds spice to the affair and it's great entertainment. On that we can all agree.
Eh ? Standard practice to check with a fielder before you pick it up.……very quick ‘ok mate?’ followed by ‘thank you bat’.I think most people on this thread get that. I certainly do.
If you take the laws of the game literally then batsmen could be out all the time via hit twice or handled the ball. Pretty much every time a defensive shot drops it dead at the batsman’s feet he’ll give it to the fielder in some way. Any appeal and he’s out. It’s just an unwritten rule that you don’t.
That’s my precise point. Exactly what we always did in village and league. But if they then appeal then, in the laws of the game, it’s out. Fail to withdraw that appeal and you’re not exactly having a beer with the oppo after.Eh ? Standard practice to check with a fielder before you pick it up.……very quick ‘ok mate?’ followed by ‘thank you bat’.