- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,019
Fair dismissal. First thing I learned at school cricket, wait for the umpire to call the over.
Umpires don’t call individual balls.Fair dismissal. First thing I learned at school cricket, wait for the umpire to call the over.
He has thrown the ball pretty much as soon as he caught it, not dead and still active.Define when the ball is dead?
Either way it’s absolutely classless and desperate behaviour from the Aussies
Utter rubbish he scrapped the ball along the ground in the act of catching the ball. Never has been never will be a legit catch.Taylor is a very intelligent and rational commentator. He was a top captain too.
I agree with him about the catching law. It was a perfectly good catch yesterday, although it fell foul of the rules. That's rightly ruled out.
Every umpire I’ve ever played with calls “over” at the end of each other. The ball wasn’t dead. I don’t like that sort of cricket (Mankads and the like) but I am sorry but I think it’s out.Umpires don’t call individual balls.
Why do some insist on defending things that are quite obviously unsportsmanlike, it’s the same as the Mankad… technically LEGAL but nonsensical and shouldn’t happen in a gentleman’s sport.
It is out.Every umpire I’ve ever played with calls “over” at the end of each other. The ball wasn’t dead. I don’t like that sort of cricket (Mankads and the like) but I am sorry but I think it’s out.
Victim mindset.
Yes. Out and brainless by Bairstow. They were watching him do it repeatedlyEvery umpire I’ve ever played with calls “over” at the end of each other. The ball wasn’t dead. I don’t like that sort of cricket (Mankads and the like) but I am sorry but I think it’s out.
Absolutely. Happened before and India withdrew their appeal.Umpires don’t call individual balls.
Why do some insist on defending things that are quite obviously unsportsmanlike, it’s the same as the Mankad… technically LEGAL but nonsensical and shouldn’t happen in a gentleman’s sport.