Never. Am not convinced the one Smith took in the first innings was either.When has that ever been a legitimate catch?
If you start letting people catch the ball like that, then the art of catching becomes a hell of a lot easier. Incredible that Starc a) took the catch like that, making no attempt to get his hand under the ball b) appealed for it as if it was a totally normal catch.
How can that not be out. Clearly caught it well of the ground. This was always in his hand unlike some catchers who straight away throw ball in the airCorrect decision
Oddly the main justification that Ponting gave on the Sky coverage that the catch was valid was that it seemed way more secure than Smith'sNever. Am not convinced the one Smith took in the first innings was either.
"Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the face"Mike Gatting only used his plan once. Malcom Marshall i think did the damage.View attachment 162954
The act of catching the ball had not finished - the ball may have been dislodged when his arm hit the ground.How can that not be out. Clearly caught it well of the ground. This was always in his hand unlike some catchers who straight away throw ball in the air
How can that not be out. Clearly caught it well of the ground. This was always in his hand unlike some catchers who straight away throw ball in the air
I don’t think it’ll be a whitewash. The teams are too well matches in terms of ability. The difference in both tests has been poor decision making by England when batting.England are playing like a bunch of clowns. Stokes is trying to rewrite the unwritten rules of cricket - don't declare a first innings and don't win the toss and insert your opponents.
He's trying to become some sort of legend but is totally ficking it up.
I predict an Australian whitewash.
Although it was very, very irritating back then. There were even grown adults doing it. Sometimes the ball wouldn't even have made it to the boundary. The final moments in a Lords final were always a problem for players as there were hundreds waiting to come on and fight for the stumps. Players potentially getting injured.Kid on the field collecting the ball. He'd be doing time for that now.
How can that not be out. Clearly caught it well off the ground. This was always in his hand unlike some catchers who straight away throw ball in the air
100% this imo - you haven’t completed the catch until you have full control over your movements, so sliding, mid dive or whatever is still part of the act of catching. He slid the ball along the floor as he stabilised himself.Think about how many times people attempt amazing catches and it pops out either when they land or in mid air, you can’t then say that’s a legitimate catch, he’s used the ground to stabilise his catching hand whilst clearly pushing the ball into the ground.
Until you have full control of your body and ball it’s not a legitimate catch, never has been, all he had to was clasp his hands together, it’s Starcs mistake as he made that catch then fluffed it.
I’ve not read further this but Stokes had said he didn’t want to see Jimmy with the bat, he wanted to see him with the new ball, bowling at the Aussie openers. He had 20 minutes to try and take a wicket, maybe two, and he took a punt. I’ve already said this on this thread and I’ll say it again. I hope he does it again! It didn’t work on that occasion. Now… he HAS to abandon the ‘Bazball’ approach as he needs to keep his team in an ashes series. The draw will keep it at 1-0 with 3 to go. I admire his scattergun approach but now, right now, is not the time.Why declare when your flying with over 4 days of a test to play?
I’ve read respected cricket writers view of this, during that test, none enamoured to say the least. Calmly explaining why it was wrong.
“The act of making the catch shall start from the time when the ball in flight comes into contact with some part of a fielder’s person other than a protective helmet, and shall end when a fielder obtains complete control both over the ball and over his own movement.” Starc did not have control of his own movement.It's not about length of time, but being 'in control'. Fielders who throw the ball in the air already (by definition as they are able to throw it) have the ball and themselves under control.
View attachment 162962
Unless it rains there’s really no chance of a draw….simply can’t see us staying in all day and not scoring 257 (less than 3 an over with Lyon out of action) as essentially it’s down to Pope, Stokes and Bairstow.I’ve not read further this but Stokes had said he didn’t want to see Jimmy with the bat, he wanted to see him with the new ball, bowling at the Aussie openers. He had 20 minutes to try and take a wicket, maybe two, and he took a punt. I’ve already said this on this thread and I’ll say it again. I hope he does it again! It didn’t work on that occasion. Now… he HAS to abandon the ‘Bazball’ approach as he needs to keep his team in an ashes series. The draw will keep it at 1-0 with 3 to go. I admire his scattergun approach but now, right now, is not the time.
If it's down to Pope I'd say England have no chance........Unless it rains there’s really no chance of a draw….simply can’t see us staying in all day and not scoring 257 (less than 3 an over with Lyon out of action) as essentially it’s down to Pope, Stokes and Bairstow.
Draw is 60/1 with the bookies, Convicts 1/6 and England 11/2.
I know. My point was that England really can’t go out and smash sixes everywhere this time. I was trying to highlight that Bazball, which I like, isn’t the way forward here. Stokes says he won’t change his approach but, in my opinion, he doesn’t have a choice. You can not gift the Aussies a 2-0 lead when you have a TINY chance of keeping it at 1-0.Unless it rains there’s really no chance of a draw….simply can’t see us staying in all day and not scoring 257 (less than 3 an over with Lyon out of action) as essentially it’s down to Pope, Stokes and Bairstow.
Draw is 60/1 with the bookies, Convicts 1/6 and England 11/2.