Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ
Hove / Παρος
Could be one accused, and 5 witnesses, for example.
You don't get arrested and released on bail as a witness. I'm pretty sure they are all accused...
Could be one accused, and 5 witnesses, for example.
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;4648619 said:You don't get arrested and released on bail as a witness. I'm pretty sure they are all accused...
I didn't arrive at any conclusion, I based it on an assumption, though a fairly logical one.
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;4648619 said:You don't get arrested and released on bail as a witness. I'm pretty sure they are all accused...
Yes, but we don't know what of. They may not all be accused of assault (as the argus claims). Any number of them might be accused of being an accessory to the main charge / witholding information / etc.
Disgraceful journalism from the local paper - to name 5 people who have been charged with nothing and definitely not been found guilty of anything is gutter journalism (that is my view no matter what the crime is or the people involved). If they are found guilty then clearly name them but if/until that happens what is the point in naming people?
A Palace fan has now posted the front page of the argus on the BBS
This
I always thought in this country (unlike US) anyone arrested for a crime could not be named until they where actually charged, would have certainly saved that poor retired college lecturer chap in Bristol last year from a character assassination. The Argus should be ashamed of themselves for sensationalist journalism.
At the risk of being fixtured can anyone give a brief rundown as to what the allegations are? I am not on this website much at the moment due to work commitments. Fancy work getting in the way of NSC.....
If it were Palace players named in these sort of allegations, do you honestly believe Brighton fans and NSC would be any different?
No, nobody can.
An "allegation of a sexual assault" is all that is publically known.
You'd probably be singing "Gypsies Tramps and Thieves"