[Politics] The 2024 US Election - *MATCH DAY*

[US Seagull]

RFK was Lawfare and sabotage. Gabbard had her debate interview removed from CNN for starters

Tulsi Gabbard vs. the DNC: her complaint about debate exclusion, explained

Gabbard argues, unconvincingly, that the DNC’s process for winnowing the debate field lacked “transparency.”

www.vox.com

and the rest you can google..

So... you got nothing then? As I suspected.

RFK lying about where he lived so that he got kicked off some ballots by the board of elections is not the doing of the Democrats. And it benefited Trump more than Harris and Biden. But it's clear the GOP are the party of no laws now.

Gabbard whining about not making the cut for the third debate isn't a "stitch up" either. She had no support because she wasn't very good. People not voting for you is called "democracy" not a "stitch up".

 

[Triggaaar]

This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations

Very poor excuse. You don't reply in good faith to any.

nd links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think)

You make very few points to concede to, but there are hundreds for you to accept, and you ignore them all.

Calling everyone else a bad faith actor is disingenuous. You can't seriously think we're all lying. You need to consider the possibility that you may be in the wrong.

 

[Pavilionaire]

He’s been “Truthing” that Harris got where she is by giving blowjobs. If I’ve understood the story correctly.

Attacks like that just leave a nasty taste.

 

[Bodian]

This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations and links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think). My time is valuable to me and I have the same level of contempt for most posters on these threads as they do for me. If in doubt google it yourself.

I must admit I'm puzzled as to why you are here at all.

You say your time is valuable, and you have contempt for most posters here, and you don't really engage by posting actual information or links to back up anything you imply/say. You rarely post on non-political (ie: football) threads.

So what is it you are actually here for - why are you wasting your time posting unverified stuff to people you have contempt for? What are you trying to achieve?

 

[Withdean South Stand]

Attacks like that just leave a nasty taste.

Only when done correctly.

Not all that long left for all this to rattle on now. The election will be called by end of day on the Wednesday - it's going to be a big Harris win and a huge victory for global Democracy.

 

[Zeberdi]

Any chance we can please stop the thread from being continually derailed with the same people having futile exchanges with CD and focus on the issues/Candidates instead?

Too much point scoring going on.

Perhaps put CD on ignore if people have a problem with him personally and CD likewise with those that are pissing you off because I for one want to see updates and discussions actually about the election and the candidates not this continual trolling of individual posters - I am sure I am not alone in that..

CD if you post what are generally contentious POV s without backing them up with verifiable references ( video/news reports etc) you can‘t blame people for calling you out. Suggest you look at some of the Republican policy positions/what Senators are saying rather than looking to Trump -( his rhetoric is a little deranged and off script most of the time but the GOP will give you an idea of what a Republican President will bring to the WH in the next 4 years if they win)

You don’t have to justify why you are on NSC though - not IMO - but yep, let’s hear why the Republicans in your POV would deserve your vote over the Democrats.

 

[Mellotron]

CD if you post what are generally contentious POV s without backing them up with verifiable references ( video/news reports etc) you can‘t blame people for calling you out. Suggest you look at some of the Republican policy positions/what Senators are saying rather than looking to Trump -( his rhetoric is a little deranged and off script most of the time but the GOP will give you an idea of what a Republican President will bring to the WH in the next 4 years if they win)

You don’t have to justify why you are on NSC though - not IMO - but yep, let’s hear why the Republicans in your POV would deserve your vote over the Democrats.

This - not being called out for supporting the Republicans - being called out for frequently posting bizarre/easily disproven comments and then refusing to back them up with any context or content whatsoever.

 

[StonehamPark]

This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations and links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think). My time is valuable to me and I have the same level of contempt for most posters on these threads as they do for me. If in doubt google it yourself.

How come you’ve replied to my prior two posts which lightly called your character into question.

— but totally ignored my prior two posts to you, providing irrefutable evidence disproving your twitter theories/stories?

You ‘don’t have time’ for one, but do for the other?

 

[Crawley Dingo]

So... you got nothing then? As I suspected.

RFK lying about where he lived so that he got kicked off some ballots by the board of elections is not the doing of the Democrats. And it benefited Trump more than Harris and Biden. But it's clear the GOP are the party of no laws now.

Gabbard whining about not making the cut for the third debate isn't a "stitch up" either. She had no support because she wasn't very good. People not voting for you is called "democracy" not a "stitch up".

And how many voted for Kamala?" Protecting our Democracy"

 

[Crawley Dingo]

Very poor excuse. You don't reply in good faith to any.




You make very few points to concede to, but there are hundreds for you to accept, and you ignore them all.

Calling everyone else a bad faith actor is disingenuous. You can't seriously think we're all lying. You need to consider the possibility that you may be in the wrong.

Most common responses are ridicule with posters "high fiving" each other as they go, blocked posters tailing me smearing and sniping(Wish people wouldn't quote them but..). I do have a little good faith but its not for the usual suspects on here as they have lost it.

 

[Crawley Dingo]

I must admit I'm puzzled as to why you are here at all.

You say your time is valuable, and you have contempt for most posters here, and you don't really engage by posting actual information or links to back up anything you imply/say. You rarely post on non-political (ie: football) threads.

So what is it you are actually here for - why are you wasting your time posting unverified stuff to people you have contempt for? What are you trying to achieve?

Are you or any of the others here questioned on purpose? Maybe you should have a word with Bad fish who I have never seen make a football post.

Your hypocrisy aside, yea ive goofed a couple of times whereas you are all perfect? But see if you can prove you are not just leftwing scum and not dine out on a couple of errors from now on eh?

 

[Triggaaar]

Most common responses are ridicule with posters "high fiving" each other as they go

Why do you think so many people are ridiculing you? Is the board just full of nasty people who are happy to ridicule anyone with a different opinion? No, no it's not. The truth is that quite a few people don't even think your account is genuine, and can't believe the things you post. That's not on them, it's on you.

If you're a staunch Republican who would never vote Democrat, that's fine. If one particular policy (eg, immigration) is so important to you that it overrides everything else, that's fine too. But instead you seem to be arguing that what Trump says and does is ok. It's not ok. No decent person could think it is, and so if you try and argue that he's done nothing wrong, and that he's not just constantly lying, then you're going have a lot of people mocking you.

 

[Crawley Dingo]

How come you’ve replied to my prior two posts which lightly called your character into question.

— but totally ignored my prior two posts to you, providing irrefutable evidence disproving your twitter theories/stories?

You ‘don’t have time’ for one, but do for the other?

Most people prioritize Character assassinations. If I skipped a couple its either because of lack of time, the posts are asinine or they've flipped me the finger first(laughter smilie) so They get it back and ignored. Unlike most on here I do not look for weak posts as a vector of attack.

 

[Crawley Dingo]

Why do you think so many people are ridiculing you?

because you a cabal of leftwing scumbags backed up by a useless and biased moderator.

Oh and don't try to put words in my mouth thanks.

 

[5Ways Gull]

There should have been enough over the last 8 years for voters to turn away from him. It's so difficult to get your head around why any decent person would vote for him.

This also troubles me greatly. I can only think that these people are "Republicans" who would rather vote for that tosser than any Democrat, however comparably decent.

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Is Crawley Bingo getting all his info from Truth Social ?

 

[US Seagull]

I don't know about you guys, but I tend to think that flashing a over a grave is just a bit weird

Even if it was legally allowed to do that at the national cemetery. Even if it wasn't the grave of a dead service person.

Maybe, maybe, if it was the grave of your (ex-) mortal enemy? Even then it seems a bit distasteful.

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

I don't know about you guys, but I tend to think that flashing a over a grave is just a bit weird

Even if it was legally allowed to do that at the national crematory. Even if it wasn't the grave of a dead service person.

Maybe, maybe, if it was the grave of your (ex-) mortal enemy? Even then it seems a bit distasteful.

A thumbsup is better than waving at nobody in the distance like he does.

 

[StonehamPark]

But see if you can prove you are not just leftwing scum and not dine out on a couple of errors from now on eh?

because you a cabal of leftwing scumbags backed up by a useless and biased moderator.

Who hurt you?

 

[Triggaaar]

because you a cabal of leftwing scumbags

I'm not particularly left wing, I'm right of most people here. I think calling me a scumbag is unfair and says more about you than it does of me.

Oh and don't try to put words in my mouth thanks.

I didn't put any words in your mouth.